Abstract
In the long eighteenth century, the judges at the Old Bailey came to allow Jewish, Scottish, Muslim, Hindu and Chinese witnesses, but not Quakers, to swear oaths according to their own cultural practices. Although a non-Christian witness might be able to give testimony under oath, the jury still had to assess the veracity of the evidence. The increasingly adversarial mode of felony trials in the eighteenth century made the separation between who was legally able to testify and who was credible more pronounced. Barristers and prisoners raised concerns about the oaths of blacks and non-Christians as a means of impugning the truthfulness of a witness.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
