Does energy poverty affect agricultural technical efficiency? Evidence from small-scale farmers in China

The impact of energy poverty on agricultural productivity: The case of China

Energy poverty is a global challenge with significant consequences for individual well-being. Using data from the China Family Panel Studies, this paper investigates the impact of energy poverty on the cognitive abilities of middle-aged and older adults, exploring its mediating and moderating mechanisms. The study reveals four main findings. First, after controlling for a comprehensive set of individual, household, and social-level factors, energy poverty is found to have a significant negative impact on the cognitive abilities of middle-aged and older adults. Second, this negative impact remains robust after addressing potential endogeneity using an instrumental variable approach and conducting a series of robustness checks. Third, the primary pathways through which energy poverty affects cognition are twofold: it undermines physical health, which in turn impairs cognitive function, and it damages psychological health, which also leads to cognitive decline. Fourth, the study finds that regular physical exercise can moderate the adverse effects of energy poverty on cognitive abilities. This research provides a valuable reference for developing policies aimed at alleviating energy poverty and improving the cognitive health of aging populations.

Can information technology construction alleviate household energy poverty? Empirical evidence from the “broadband China” Pilot Policy

In recent years, through the implementation of a series of policies, such as the delimitation of major grain producing areas and the construction of advantageous and characteristic agricultural product areas, the spatial distribution of agriculture in China has changed significantly; however, research on the impact of such changes on the efficiency of agricultural technology is still lacking. Taking 11 cities in Hebei Province as the research object, this study examines the spatial dependence of regional agricultural technical efficiency using the stochastic frontier analysis and spatial econometric analysis. The results show that the improvement in agricultural technical efficiency is evident in all cities in Hebei Province from 2008 to 2017, but there is scope for further improvement. Industrial agglomeration has statistical significance in improving the efficiency of agricultural technology. Further, there is an obvious spatial correlation and difference in agricultural technical efficiency. Optimizing the spatial distribution of agricultural production, promoting the innovation, development, and application of agricultural technology, and promoting the expansion of regional elements can contribute to improving agricultural technical efficiency.

Nonfarm Activities and Household Production Choices in Smallholder Agriculture in Vietnam

Can renewable energy technology innovation alleviate energy poverty? Perspective from the marketization level

Synergistic effects of regional environmental governance on alleviating energy poverty and promoting household decarbonization

How does regional technological innovation affect energy poverty? The role of industrial structure distortion

Although the clarification of property rights for agricultural land has the potential to enhance agricultural production efficiency and support its sustainable growth, this goal may not always be met in reality. As a result, the emphasis of this study is on the elements that affect agricultural output. It also examines how the stability of land rights affects agricultural production efficiency and, most importantly, how the heterogeneity of farmers' perspectives affects this process. Through the empirical test using the data of farmers in Henan Province, the largest wheat area in China, the results show that: (1) The farmland confirmation policy significantly promotes the improvement of the pure technical efficiency of agricultural production, a series of robustness tests, and the treatment of endogenous problems, which also confirmed the robustness of the results. (2) In the allocation of factors, agricultural investment and credit acquisition have been proved to be important influencing mechanisms, while labor and land transfer have not played a mechanistic role. (3) Heterogeneity analysis shows that the self-service of farmers choosing to purchase agricultural machinery is more efficient than purchasing outsourcing services; The agricultural production of farmer households without hired workers has a significant technical efficiency, but the impact on farmer households with hired workers is not significant; for farmer households with agricultural insurance purchase behavior, purchase willingness, and planting and breeding advantages, the farmland ownership confirmation policy can play a more important role in promoting the pure technical efficiency of agricultural production; The promotion effect of the farmland right confirmation policy on the pure technical efficiency of agricultural output is strongest when there is a smaller level of farmers operating on a part-time basis and when more farmers prioritize profit maximization as the production goal. Corresponding policy recommendations are made at the conclusion of the study in light of the conclusions mentioned.

Sustainable agricultural economic growth emphasizes the improvement of agricultural technical efficiency. This paper examines the impact of the rural land transfer market on agricultural technical efficiency by constructing a theoretical framework of the impact mechanism of the rural land transfer market on agricultural technical efficiency. The data of rural land transfer market in 30 provinces from 2005 to 2020 in China were used in this paper, and the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) and Tobit model equation linkage was applied. The results showed: (1) In terms of time differences, the rural land transfer market had a significant stimulating and involution effect on agricultural technical efficiency. In 2006–2015, the rural land transfer market had a significant stimulating effect on agricultural technical efficiency, and, in 2016–2020, the rural land transfer market entered the stage of involution, and the rural land transfer market had a involution effect on agricultural technical efficiency. (2) In terms of regional differences, the stimulating effect of the rural land transfer market on agricultural technical efficiency was mainly concentrated in the main grain producing areas, and the involution effect was mainly concentrated in the non-main grain producing areas. (3) The involution effect of the rural land transfer market exceeded the stimulating effect, which made the rural land transfer market have a inhibition effect on agricultural technical efficiency from a comprehensive view of the overall trend.

Energy poverty is a crucial issue faced by countries all around the world, as the largest developing country in the world, China is also experiencing energy poverty problems. In order to explore the health effect of energy poverty in China, this paper first uses the principal component analysis (PCA) to construct a comprehensive index to measure energy poverty, and then adopts the ordinary least square method (OLS), fixed effect model (FE), instrumental variable two-stage least squares (IV-2SLS) regression to study the impact of energy poverty on the physical and mental health of Chinese people based on China Family Panel Studies 2018 (CFPS 2018). The study discovers that energy poverty significantly hampers the mental and physical health of Chinese people, an increase in energy poverty might cause 28.74%、18.69% decrease in mental and physical health respectively. Moreover, this paper further explores the influencing paths of energy poverty by intermediary effect and regulatory effect. It is revealed that in addition to directly affecting physical and mental health, energy poverty also have a negative impact on physical and mental health by affecting the accessibility of a series of resources, such as water and food, reducing the opportunities for physical exercise and increasing medical expenses. However, the impact is restricted by age and family income. Finally, under the national strategy of China, this paper further discusses how to give consideration to the joint implementation of heath and emission reduction strategies, then gives specific policy suggestions based on the results.

How renewable energy alleviate energy poverty? A global analysis

Structural Adjustment and Economic Efficiency of Rice Farmers in Northern Ghana

ABSTRACTEnergy poverty poses a significant challenge in the context of stringent environmental policies, particularly in developing economies like China. This study investigates the impact of energy poverty at the household level from 2010 to 2022 using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). The analysis incorporates information from 49,373 households across 25 regional administrative divisions, excluding regions with insufficient representation. We measure energy poverty using two proxies: the proportion of household energy expenditure to total household income, and a threshold indicator where households spending more than 10% of their budget on energy are classified as energy poor. Covariates include family size, age, and education level of household heads, and regional characteristics (North–South division). Results reveal that households in northern China experience significantly higher energy poverty, exacerbated by stricter environmental policies and climatic conditions. Energy storage systems are emerging as a critical mitigating factor, reducing energy costs and smoothing consumption patterns. Policy implications suggest incentivizing affordable and accessible energy storage technologies to alleviate energy poverty while ensuring environmental sustainability.

Despite increasing policy emphasis on creating a more equitable society as a key component of the energy transition, there is still a dearth of assessments investigating the equity outcomes of decarbonisation scenarios and community scale Just Transition case studies, and those focusing on both energy and transport. This work seeks to fill this gap by examining energy and transport poverty could be alleviated by scenario analysis of these linked aspects of the Just Transition using an urban and a rural case study in Northern Ireland. This work examines the total costs of ownership of mode shifting and car sharing in transport and investment needs for domestic retrofit for energy poverty alleviation. The analysis finds that eBikes for suitable commutes bring substantial economic and environmental benefits compared to cars. For car sharing, the economic and environmental benefits are also substantial, with electric vehicles becoming cost effective at all occupancy rates from 2025. Regarding the alleviation of energy poverty, the mean cost to retrofit energy poor dwellings ranges from £2,143 depending on dwelling type. However, up to 3.5% of residents of each dwelling type will find the consequent debt burden causes significant financial stress, particularly for the elderly and those claiming benefits. This study concludes that the current mechanisms to support energy and transport poverty alleviation are insufficient and too narrowly targeted. Their expansion is a requisite component of any hopes of achieving a Just Transition in Northern Ireland.