Abstract
This article reviews different thoughts of modern sociologists about social action to examine how the differences in the meaning of social action influence sociological analysis. This article also discusses the implication of these differences in the meaning of social action to sociological analysis. Four articles and two books of selected modern sociologists have been reviewed to explore the research questions of this article. This article finds that modern sociologists take social action as an important concept in sociological analysis. Classical sociologists, such as Max Weber, also suggest taking social action as a central focus in sociological study. This article observes that whether action is exerted based on structure or the actor’s self-interpreting power is one of the key issues in the ideas of modern sociologists.
Highlights
Various theorists provide different thoughts about social action; in some points they agreed (Goffman, 1956; Giddens, 1984; Coleman, 1994)
Analysis of social action has a significant effect on sociological research (Schrag, 1959)
The search results in Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science did not show any evidence of recent research on the effect of distinct views of social action on sociological research (Bonna, 2021)
Summary
Various theorists provide different thoughts about social action; in some points they agreed (Goffman, 1956; Giddens, 1984; Coleman, 1994). Analysis of social action has a significant effect on sociological research (Schrag, 1959). Inconsequence of the above-noted points, this article presents distinct views of modern sociologists about social action to explore how the differences change the analysis in sociological study. The implication of these differences in thoughts to sociological analysis is discussed in this article. Anthony Giddens regarding social action, and secondly, what are the implications of the differences in the ideas of these thinkers in sociological analysis?. Nandi AK / Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Legal Studies, 3(5), 193-199, 2021
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Legal Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.