Abstract

This research aims to examine empirically the overreliance on representativeness heuristic and anchoring-adjustment influences experienced by investors in forecasting future earnings. This research was a laboratory experiment with a design of 2x2 full factorial between subject. The results showed that representativeness heuristics were only experienced by investors who obtained positive information. Besides, this study also shows that investors do not overreliance on anchoring-adjustment heuristics. Generally, this research shows that cognitive biases occur when the information presented is of good value so that it can be taken into consideration for investors to be more careful in making predictions. Multiple benchmark information can be used as a consideration in evaluating the company’s earnings and stock performance.

Highlights

  • The main goal in the discussion of earnings forecasting is not to find the best model but to identify useful models

  • The experimental revealed that investors relied heavily on previous earnings and made the level and pattern of the previous earnings their initial belief

  • This study presents validity data to support a vignette-based instrument quantifying bias due to the anchoring, availability, and representativeness heuristics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main goal in the discussion of earnings forecasting is not to find the best model but to identify useful models. Heuristic representativeness is a psychological bias that explains that in conditions of uncertainty, an investor tends to believe in history in terms of the common results of a company’s performance in general (Boussaidi, 2013). The earnings expected by investors with heuristic representativeness are greater than rational investors This can answer the question of why most investors use the heuristic representativeness in making estimates in the capital market. Initial values can be offered in earnings for the past period (Wahyuni et al, 2016) Both of heuristic factors, namely representativeness and anchoring-adjustment, cause cognitive biases that are considered as inaccuracies in predicting future earnings performance (Lee et al, 2016). The use of information with multiple benchmark models illustrates that comprehensive disclosure of information can assist investors in predicting accounting information

Multiple Refference Point Theory
Heuristic
Representativeness
Anchoring-adjustment
Experimental design
Dependent variable
Independent variable
Experimental procedure
Treatment
Manipulation check
Subject demography
Hypothesis test and discussion
Representativeness heuristic
Findings
Anchoring-adjustment Heuristic
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.