Abstract
BackgroundUnconventional natural gas (UNG) extraction (fracking) is ongoing in 29 North American shale basins (20 states), with ~6000 wells found within the Fayetteville shale (north-central Arkansas). If the chemical signature of fracking is detectable in streams, it can be employed to bookmark potential impacts. We evaluated benthic biofilm community composition as a proxy for stream chemistry so as to segregate anthropogenic signatures in eight Arkansas River catchments. In doing so, we tested the hypothesis that fracking characteristics in study streams are statistically distinguishable from those produced by agriculture or urbanization.ResultsFour tributary catchments had UNG-wells significantly more dense and near to our sampling sites and were grouped as ‘potentially-impacted catchment zones’ (PICZ). Four others were characterized by significantly larger forested area with greater slope and elevation but reduced pasture, and were classified as ‘minimally-impacted’ (MICZ). Overall, 46 bacterial phyla/141 classes were identified, with 24 phyla (52%) and 54 classes (38%) across all samples. PICZ-sites were ecologically more variable than MICZ-sites, with significantly greater nutrient levels (total nitrogen, total phosphorous), and elevated Cyanobacteria as bioindicators that tracked these conditions. PICZ-sites also exhibited elevated conductance (a correlate of increased ion concentration) and depressed salt-intolerant Spartobacteria, suggesting the presence of brine as a fracking effect. Biofilm communities at PICZ-sites were significantly less variable than those at MICZ-sites.ConclusionsStudy streams differed by Group according to morphology, land use, and water chemistry but not in biofilm community structure. Those at PICZ-sites covaried according to anthropogenic impact, and were qualitatively similar to communities found at sites disturbed by fracking. The hypothesis that fracking signatures in study streams are distinguishable from those produced by other anthropogenic effects was statistically rejected. Instead, alterations in biofilm community composition, as induced by fracking, may be less specific than initially predicted, and thus more easily confounded by agriculture and urbanization effects (among others). Study streams must be carefully categorized with regard to the magnitude and extent of anthropogenic impacts. They must also be segregated with statistical confidence (as herein) before fracking impacts are monitored.
Highlights
Unconventional natural gas (UNG) extraction is ongoing in 29 North American shale basins (20 states), with ~6000 wells found within the Fayetteville shale
Shale gas is termed ‘unconventional’ in that it is trapped in strata with low porosity and permeability and requires additional extraction processes beyond those normally employed in more traditional petroleum exploitations
Four sampling locations quite distant from UNG wells were allocated as minimally-impacted catchment zone’ (MICZ)-sites (i.e., ‘minimally-impacted catchment zone;’ = Group 1), whereas four that were significantly proximal to UNG wells were defined potentially impacted catchment zone’ (PICZ)-sites (i.e., ‘potentially-impacted catchment zone;’ = Group 2)
Summary
Unconventional natural gas (UNG) extraction (fracking) is ongoing in 29 North American shale basins (20 states), with ~6000 wells found within the Fayetteville shale (north-central Arkansas). Unconventional natural gas (UNG) extraction has been promoted as a potential fuel source in North America, as well as a bridge to a cleaner energy economy [1]. It is ongoing in over 30 states, those containing appropriate geologic ‘plays,’ i.e., geographic areas that contain fine-grained sedimentary rock with an appropriate clay-to-silt particle size. Less than half is quickly returned to the surface (i.e., as flowback), whereas the majority (i.e., produced water) lingers underground and is slowly mobilized as gas is removed [5]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.