Abstract
Most of the leading schools in social sciences and neoclassical economics lack a concept of human action and active human. Reflexivity is an integral element of a human action. Although he is one of the famous names of neoclassic school, Lucas acknowledged the importance of reflexivity. In this paper it is argued and criticized the underlying ontology of neoclassic school in the context of Lucas’s approach to reflexivity, which is fail to be related with active human.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
