Abstract

Sea turtles are distributed in tropical and subtropical seas worldwide. They play several ecological roles and are considered important indicators of the health of marine ecosystems. Studying epibiotic diatoms living on turtle shells suggestively has great potential in the study of turtle behavior because diatoms are always there. However, diatom identification at the species level is time consuming, requires well-trained specialists, and there is a high probability of finding new taxa growing on turtle shells, which makes identification tricky. An alternative approach based on DNA barcoding and high throughput sequencing (HTS), metabarcoding, has been developed in recent years to identify species at the community level by using a DNA reference library. The suitabilities of morphological and molecular approaches were compared. Diatom assemblages were sampled from seven juvenile green turtles (Chelonia mydas) from Mayotte Island, France. The structures of the epibiotic diatom assemblages differed between both approaches. This resulted in different clustering of the turtles based on their diatom communities. Metabarcoding allowed better discrimination between turtles based on their epibiotic diatom assemblages and put into evidence the presence of a cryptic diatom diversity. Microscopy, for its part, provided more ecological information of sea turtles based on historical bibliographical data and the abundances of ecological guilds of the diatom species present in the samples. This study shows the complementary nature of these two methods for studying turtle behavior.

Highlights

  • The aim of this study was to determine whether metabarcoding carried out on epibiotic diatoms from sea turtle shells provide the same information about turtle behavior as does microscopy

  • Why the epibiotic diatom assemblages on sea turtles differ between metabarcoding and microscopy?

  • The strength of microscopy is its ability to identify a large majority of the taxa, bringing valuable ecological information based on the historical bibliographical data and ecological guild abundances

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several methods, such as aerial survey [10,11,12,13,14], snorkeling survey [14, 15] and telemetry [16] (e.g., very high frequency telemetry, sonic telemetry and satellite telemetry), have been used to study and monitor the population and distribution of sea turtles Data acquisition systems such as GPS tracking, geolocating tags, time-temperature-depth recorders, and heart rate counters were been used to monitor their behavior and physiology [16,17,18,19,20]. The capacity for diatom assemblages to change their species composition with changes in environmental conditions such as water turbulence [42], light intensity [43], and nutrient levels [44] is one of their characteristics

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.