Abstract

This study examines the way in which the Neoplatonic philosopher Proclus treats an episode of the dialectic communication between Socrates and Alcibiades in the Platonic dialogue Alcibiades I. More specifically, it refers to how the characteristics and the choices of two different types of lovers – the divinely inspired one and the vulgar one – are displayed in the aforementioned text. The characterization ‘divinely inspired lover’ befits a person who communicates in a pure way with his beloved one and attempts to teach the latter the objective values of the intellect. By contrast, the characterization of the ‘vulgar lover’ befits that individual that approaches another individual exclusively on the basis of his external beauty. The first type of lover is presented within the realms of the permanently qualitative, while the second as someone who satisfies solemnly his subjectivity and his instincts. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that Proclus argues that Socrates, whom he considers to represent the very definition of a divinely inspired lover, is inspired by divine powers and attempts to act towards to his fellows – in this instance to Alcibiades – in the way through which the divine providence is revealed.

Highlights

  • The aim of the present paper is twofold

  • The following parts of this study present Proclus’ references to the criteria that Socrates fulfils as an educator and as a lover, in order to approach Alcibiades through the terms of high anthropological deontology

  • This is a course whose culmination is located in the divine spirit, which, as an expression of the divine providence, offers to man the integrity and the diachronic of the objective values

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of the present paper is twofold. Firstly, it will attempt to describe the content, the extent and the intentions that form the relation which according to Proclus ought to be developed between the educator and the receiver of education. The Neoplatonic philosopher finds in this communication more than one meaning of educational relation He reveals critical anthropological and existential aims guided, by divine and metaphysical inspirations. The following parts of this study present Proclus’ references to the criteria that Socrates fulfils as an educator and as a lover, in order to approach Alcibiades through the terms of high anthropological deontology. This is a course whose culmination is located in the divine spirit, which, as an expression of the divine providence, offers to man the integrity and the diachronic of the objective values. Regarding all the aforementioned aspects, Proclus refers to certain general educational positions, using always Socrates as a cause and as a starting point.

Objectives
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.