Disturbance is an important factor in the evolution and distribution of root-sprouting species

Abstract

We address the neglected issue of ecological and evolutionary significance of root sprouting (RS) in plants. RS has been considered a sort of morphological curiosity. However, existing data of the Central European flora show that it occurs in about 10% of species. These species are therefore independent of a stem-derived bud bank in their resprouting. As sprouting from roots has been hypothesised to help plants survive disturbance, we used a large data set (2914 species with data on presence/absence of RS from Central Europe) to perform comparative analyses of its occurrence in disturbed habitats, evolution of RS in response to disturbance, and its distribution among individual plant lineages. To address these questions, we linked the data with species-level indicator values for disturbance, data on additional functional traits and phylogenetic data. We confirmed that RS ability is more frequent in plants growing in habitats subjected to disturbance, especially in annuals and clonal species. This contrasts with clonality via stem-based organs, which does not promote occurrence in disturbed habitats. Disturbance severity is the most important factor determining RS species distribution, whereas disturbance frequency plays a smaller role. RS is phylogenetically less conservative than sprouting from the stem-based belowground bud bank and thus can be easily acquired or lost in evolution, although these rates strongly differ between individual lineages. Evolution of RS seems to be driven largely by occurrence in disturbed habitats, and has appeared/disappeared independently of the presence of a stem-derived bud bank. Importantly, the data support the scenario in which colonisation of such habitats occurs prior to acquiring the RS ability, which develops only later. RS is hence a more important ecological trait than hitherto assumed. It constitutes an independent route of response to severe disturbance and its ecological effects and evolutionary patterns differ from stem-based clonality.