Abstract

In this paper, in order to apply the concept of octahedron sets to multi-criteria group decision-making problems, we define several similarity and distance measures for octahedron sets. We present a multi-criteria group decision-making method with linguistic variables in octahedron set environment. We give a numerical example for multi-criteria group decision-making problems.

Highlights

  • In real world, we frequently encounter with decision-making problems with uncertainty and vagueness that can be difficult to solve with the classical methods

  • All these findings will provide a base to researchers who want to work in the field of the application of octahedron sets and will help to strengthen the foundations of the other multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) problems in octahedron set environment, such as economic policy, foreign policy between countries, trade policy, financial policy, etc., by using big data

  • We wished to renew an interest in the systematic study of the relationships between multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) method with respect to octahedron set theory

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We frequently encounter with decision-making problems with uncertainty and vagueness that can be difficult to solve with the classical methods. A number of techniques have been developed to solve uncertinities; similarity measures are one of tools solving decision-making problems. Hsiao [1] studied some similarity measures for fuzzy sets introduced by Zadeh [2]. Pramanik and Mondal [3]. Defined the concept of weighted fuzzy similarity measure (called a tangent similarity measure) and applied it to medical diagnosis. Hwang and Yang [4] made a new similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets proposed by Atanassov [5]. Pramanik and Mondal [6] proposed intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measure based on tangent function and applied it to multi–attribute decision. Ren and Wang [7] introduced the notion of similarity measures for interval-valued intuitionstic fuzzy sets proposed by Atanassov and Gargov [8]

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.