Disparities in home health-care service utilization and intensity among immigrant older adults

This study examines the likelihood of nursing home and home health care use for childless older Americans. Four research questions are addressed: (1) Are the childless elderly at a greater risk of nursing home and home health care use? (2) Is it childlessness per se or not having children with particular characteristics that affects the likelihood of using these formal long-term care services? (3) Does having additional children beyond the first one have a significant effect on the use of these services? (4) Are the effects of childlessness different on the likelihood of nursing home and home health care use? Longitudinal data from the first (1993) and second (1995) waves of the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old Survey (AHEAD) and multinomial logistic regression models are used for the analyses. Separate models are developed for women and men, each controlling for a variety of demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related characteristics of sample persons. Findings indicate childlessness as an important risk factor, especially for older women's use of nursing home services. Implications of findings for planning for long-term care needs of the baby boom generation are discussed.

Home health care (HHC) has been increasingly used to improve care transitions and avoid poor outcomes, but there is limited data on its use and efficacy following coronary artery bypass grafting. The purpose of this study was to describe HHC use and its association with outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Retrospective analysis of 100% of Medicare fee-for-service files identified 77 331 beneficiaries undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and discharged to home between July 2016 and December 2018. The primary exposure of HHC use was defined as the presence of paid HHC claims within 30 days of discharge. Hierarchical logistic regression identified predictors of HHC use and the percentage of variation in HHC use attributed to the hospital. Propensity-matched logistic regression compared mortality, readmissions, emergency department visits, and cardiac rehabilitation enrollment at 30 and 90 days after discharge between HHC users and nonusers. A total of 26 751 (34.6%) of beneficiaries used HHC within 30 days of discharge, which was more common among beneficiaries who were older (72.9 versus 72.5 years), male (79.4% versus 77.4%), White (90.2% versus 89.2%), and not Medicare-Medicaid dual eligible (6.7% versus 8.8%). The median hospital-level rate of HHC use was 31.0% (interquartile range, 13.7%-54.5%) and ranged from 0% to 94.2%. Nearly 30% of the interhospital variation in HHC use was attributed to the discharging hospital (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.296 [95% CI, 0.275-0.318]). Compared with non-HHC users, those using HHC were less likely to have a readmission or emergency department visit, were more likely to enroll in cardiac rehabilitation, and had modestly higher mortality within 30 or 90 days of discharge. A third of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting used HHC within 30 days of discharge, with wide interhospital variation in use and mixed associations with clinical outcomes and health care utilization.

To prospectively study the incidence of and risk factors for home health care (HHC) use in a cohort of elderly medical and surgical patients discharged from acute care. Although HHC is commonly received by patients in this group, its predictors have not been well studied. Prospective cohort study. Medical and surgical wards at a university teaching hospital, followed by 23 Medicare-certified HHC agencies in the study catchment area. 226 medical and surgical patients aged 70 years and older immediately after discharge from acute care. HHC initiated within 14 days after hospital discharge, measured by direct review of HHC agency records. The incidence of HHC initiated within 2 weeks post-discharge was 75/226 (34%). The median duration of service was 30 days (range 3-483) with a median of 3 visits per week. Four independent predictors of HHC were identified through multivariate analysis: educational level < or = 12 years (relative risk (RR) 3.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6 to 6.6); less accessible social support (RR, 1.7; CI 0.9 to 3.1); impairment in at least one instrumental activity of daily living (RR, 1.9; CI, 1.0, 3.4); and prior HHC use (RR, 2.1; CI, 1.2 to 3.6). Risk strata were created by adding one point for each risk factor present: with 0-1 risk factors, 8% used HHC; with two risk factors, 28%; with three risk factors, 45%, with four risk factors, 76%. This trend was statistically significant (P < 0.001). HHC use is common among elderly patients after discharge from acute care. A simple predictive model based on four risk factors can be used on admission to predict HHC use. This model may be useful for discharge planning and health care utilization planning for the elderly population.

This study seeks to identify ethnoracial differences in self-reported home health care (HHC) use among older adults. To do so, we examined 8,817 people aged 65 and older from the 2016 wave of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative survey of older adults in the U.S. The dependent variable was whether HRS participants reported any HHC service use in the past two years. The primary independent variable was ethnoracial grouping, which included non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic groups. Multivariable logistic regressions stratified by ethnoracial grouping identified correlates of HHC use. We found that HHC use was more prevalent among non-Hispanic Blacks (14.9%) than in non-Hispanic Whites (10.1%) or Hispanics (10.7%). For all ethnoracial groups, increasing age, dementia, activities of daily living impairment, medical comorbidity (except for Hispanics), and hospitalization (in the past two years) were associated with an increased likelihood of HHC use. In addition, we identified ethnoracial differences in the correlates of HHC use. Among non-Hispanic Whites, more formal education and Medicaid insurance were associated with a higher likelihood of using HHC. For non-Hispanic Blacks, residing in rural areas was associated with a decreased likelihood of HHC use, whereas being single and living alone were associated with an increased likelihood of HHC use. This study thereby identified notable ethnoracial differences in the correlates of HHC use among older adults.

In recent years, public reporting, targeted financial penalties, and incentives to develop alternative payment models that include the assumption of financial risk have compelled hospitals to focus on reducing readmission rates for high-cost conditions such as heart failure (HF). When older patients with multiple medical conditions including HF are discharged from the hospital, they are vulnerable to adverse events, which may result in recurrent hospitalization (the post-hospital syndrome).1 In theory, providing home health nursing and therapy could promote recovery in vulnerable HF patients with post-hospital syndrome and potentially reduce readmissions. Within the United States, home health care (HHC) referrals after acute care hospitalization increased by 65% to 3.7 million between 2001 and 2012.2,3 Patients discharged from US hospitals with a primary diagnosis of HF had the highest number of HHC referrals during this time, with ≈200 000 post-acute HHC referrals in 2012.2 In addition, HHC surpassed skilled nursing facilities as the most frequently used post-acute care among Medicare beneficiaries with HF in 2012 (unpublished HCUPnet data). Such an increase in HHC use for patients with HF is likely related to multiple factors, including decreasing length of stay for patients with HF4 and more recent pressures to improve readmission rates for HF after adoption of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, which included the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program that was implemented in 2012.5,6 Despite substantial growth in post-acute HHC referrals for patients with HF,2 it is unclear whether HHC delivered in real-world settings consistently provides high-value care. Understanding the characteristics of effective post-acute HHC for patients with HF will inform best practices, optimal outcomes for cost, and ultimately high-value care. Because most patients referred for skilled HHC are Medicare beneficiaries, Medicare eligibility and payment policies have important implications for HHC. Patients who …

The objective of this work was to estimate the effect of Medicare beneficiaries' use of home health care (HHC) for 6 months after hospital discharge on the change in functional status over a 1-year period beginning before hospitalization. Data came from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, which is a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries, in-person interview data, and Medicare claims for 1991 through 1994 for 2,127 nondisabled, community-dwelling, elderly Medicare beneficiaries who were hospitalized within 6 months of their annual in-person interviews. Econometric estimation with the instrumental variable method was used to correct for observational data bias, ie, the nonrandom allocation of discharged beneficiaries to the use of posthospitalization HHC. The analysis estimates a first-stage model of HHC use from which an instrumental variable estimate is constructed to estimate the effect on change in functional status. The instrumental variable estimates suggest that HHC users experienced greater improvements in functional status than nonusers as measured by the change in a continuous scale based on the number and mix of activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living before and after hospitalization. The estimated improvement in functional status could be as large as 13% for a 10% increase in HHC use. In contrast, estimation with the observational data on HHC use implies that HHC users had poorer health outcomes. Adjusting for potential observational data bias is critical to obtaining estimates of the relationship between the use of posthospitalization HHC and the change in health before and after hospitalization. After adjustment, the results suggest that efforts to constrain Medicare's spending for HHC, as required by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, may lead to poorer health outcomes for some beneficiaries.

Objective:To examine trends in home health care (HHC) use in congregate living and compare characteristics of HHC use between Medicare patients in congregate living and those in other home settings.Design:Retrospective cohort study describing HHC use, in and outside of congregate living, using national Medicare claims, assessment, and administrative data (2014–2019). We compared HHC use by setting, on HHC quality, planned visit quantity, referral source (post-acute or community-initiated), and recertifications. We additionally examined whether HHC patterns across settings differed by patient dual eligibility and race-ethnicity.Setting and Participants:Traditional Medicare (TM) and Medicare Advantage (MA) HHC patients aged 67 and older in congregate living or elsewhere.Methods:Multivariable regressions.Results:15.9% of HHC episodes in 2018–2019 were in congregate living, which increased 20.5% between 2014 and 2019. TM patients in congregate living were 4.4% (2.3 ppt, 95% CI: 1.7, 2.9) more likely to use high-quality agencies, had 8.7% (0.7 visits, 95% CI: 0.7, 0.8) more planned visits, were 27.6% (14.9 ppt, 95% CI: 14.7, 15.1) more likely to have community-initiated referrals, and 9.9% (3.2 ppt, 95% CI: 2.9, 3.5) more likely to be recertified compared with TM patients in other settings; differences were similar between settings among MA enrollees. Compared with their counterparts, dually eligible and racial-ethnic minoritized populations in congregate living were 2.6% (−1.5 ppt, 95% CI:−2.2,−0.8%) and 1.6% less likely (−0.9 ppt, 95% CI: −1.6, −0.3%) to use high-quality agencies, respectively, and dually eligible patients in congregate living had 6% fewer planned visits (−0.64 visits, 95% CI: −0.72, −55); these differences persisted across settings.Conclusion and Implications:Congregate living may have facilitated access to higher quality and quantity of HHC, but inequitably. Further research is needed to determine the value of high-frequency community-initiated HHC referrals in congregate living.

Home health care (HHC) provides skilled nursing (e.g., wound care, medication management), therapies (e.g., physical, occupational, speech), and aide services (e.g. bathing, grooming, dressing), which are key supports necessary to regain function, restore health, and maintain independence in the community. This panel presents five studies examining factors that challenge equitable access and high quality outcomes associated with skilled HHC among vulnerable older populations (i.e., Veterans, people living with dementia, patients needing post-acute care). The first panelist will discuss findings using national-level HHC quality data demonstrating that access to high-quality HHC varies widely across the country for people with dementia. The second panelist will share findings from a novel data linkage using Medicare Advantage (MA) and traditional Medicare claims to understand variation in use of HHC among people living with dementia. The third panelist’s presentation will focus on a particularly vulnerable population - hospitalized older Veterans - and how payer source shapes the use of post-acute HHC. The fourth panelist will discuss results from a qualitative study with MA plans about how they design and manage post-acute HHC benefits. The final presenter will share results from an analysis of national standardized HHC assessment data to identify failures in information transfer that impact care delivery and quality for HHC patients living with dementia. The discussant, a national industry leader with over two decades of experience working in the delivery of HHC, will contextualize findings and discuss how they can inform national policy discussions around improving access and quality of HHC.

Home health care supports patient goals for aging in place. Our objective was to determine if home health care use in the last 3 years of life reduces the risk of inpatient death without hospice. We analyzed the characteristics of 2,065,300 Medicare beneficiaries who died in 2019 and conducted multinomial logistic regression analyses to evaluate the association between the use and timing of home health care, dementia diagnosis, and place of death. Receiving any home health care in the last 3 years of life was associated with a lower probability of inpatient death without hospice (Pr 23.3% vs 31.5%, p < .001), and this effect was stronger when home health care began prior to versus during the last year of life (Pr 22.5% vs 24.3%, p < .001). Among all decedents, the probability of death at home with hospice compared to inpatient death with hospice was greater when any home health care was used (Pr 46.0% vs 36.5%, p < .001), and this association was strongest among beneficiaries with dementia who started home health care at least 1 year prior to death (Pr 55.6%, p < .001). Use of home health care during the last 3 years of life was associated with reduced rates of inpatient death without hospice, and increased rates of home death with hospice. Increasing affordable access to home health care can positively affect end-of-life care outcomes for older Americans and their family caregivers, especially those with dementia.

A previous study used aggregate (region-level) data to investigate whether home health care serves as a substitute for inpatient hospital care and concluded that “there is no evidence that services provided at home replace hospital services.” However, that study was based on a cross-section of regions observed at a single point of time and did not control for unobserved regional heterogeneity. In this article, state-level employment data are used to reexamine whether home health care serves as a substitute for inpatient hospital care. This analysis is based on longitudinal (panel) data—observations on states in two time periods—which enable the reduction or elimination of biases that arise from use of cross-sectional data. This study finds that states that had higher home health care employment growth during the period 1998–2008 tended to have lower hospital employment growth, controlling for changes in population. Moreover, states that had higher home health care payroll growth tended to have lower hospital payroll growth. The estimates indicate that the reduction in hospital payroll associated with a $1,000 increase in home health payroll is not less than $1,542, and may be as high as $2,315. This study does not find a significant relationship between growth in utilization of home health care and growth in utilization of nursing and residential care facilities. An important reason why home health care may serve as a substitute for hospital care is that the availability of home health care may allow patients to be discharged from the hospital earlier. Hospital discharge data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project are used to test the hypothesis that use of home health care reduces the length of hospital stays. Major Diagnostic Categories with larger increases in the fraction of patients discharged to home health care tended to have larger declines in mean length of stay (LOS). Between 1998 and 2008, mean LOS declined by 4.1%, from 4.78 to 4.59 days. The estimates are consistent with the hypothesis that this was entirely due to the increase in the fraction of hospital patients discharged to home health care, from 6.4% in 1998 to 9.9% in 2008. The estimated reduction in 2008 hospital costs resulting from the rise in the fraction of hospital patients discharged to home health care may have been 36% larger than the increase in the payroll of the home health care industry.

A previous study used aggregate (region-level) data to investigate whether home health care serves as a substitute for inpatient hospital care, and concluded that “there is no evidence that services provided at home replace hospital services.” However, that study was based on a cross-section of regions observed at a single point of time, and did not control for unobserved regional heterogeneity. In this paper, I use state-level employment data to reexamine whether home health care serves as a substitute for inpatient hospital care. My analysis is based on longitudinal (panel) data — observations on states in two time periods — which enable me to reduce or eliminate biases that arise from use of cross-sectional data.I find that states that had higher home health care employment growth during the period 1998-2008 tended to have lower hospital employment growth, controlling for changes in population. Moreover, states that had higher home health care payroll growth tended to have lower hospital payroll growth. The estimates indicate that the reduction in hospital payroll associated with a $1000 increase in home health payroll is not less than $1542, and may be as high as $2315. I do not find a significant relationship between growth in utilization of home health care and growth in utilization of nursing and residential care facilities.An important reason why home health care may serve as a substitute for hospital care is that the availability of home health care may allow patients to be discharged from the hospital earlier. I use hospital discharge data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project to test the hypothesis that use of home health care reduces the length of hospital stays. I find that Major Diagnostic Categories with larger increases in the fraction of patients discharged to home health care tended to have larger declines in mean length of stay (LOS). Between 1998 and 2008, mean LOS declined by 4.1%, from 4.78 days to 4.59. The estimates indicate that this was entirely due to the increase in the fraction of hospital patients discharged to home health care, from 6.4% in 1998 to 9.9% in 2008. The estimated reduction in 2008 hospital costs resulting from the rise in the fraction of hospital patients discharged to home health care is 36% larger than the increase in the payroll of the home health care industry.

Background:Home health care is a core benefit of Medicare and Medicaid insurance programs and includes services to improve health, maintain health, or slow health decline.Objective:To examine the relationship between home health care use during the last three years of life and hospice use in the last six months of life among Medicare beneficiaries with and without dementia.Design:Nationally representative retrospective cohort study.Setting/Subjects:Medicare beneficiaries with at least three years of continuous enrollment who died in 2019 in the United States (n = 2,169,422).Measurements:The primary outcome was hospice use, and the secondary outcome was hospice duration. The independent variable was a composite of the presence and timing of home health care initiation during the last three years of life.Results:Home health care was used by 46.4% of Medicare beneficiaries and hospice care was used by 53.1% of beneficiaries, with 28.3% using both. Compared with beneficiaries who did not use home health care, those who started home health care before the last year of life (odds ratio [OR] = 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.56–1.58) or during the last year of life (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.74–1.77) were more likely to use hospice. The effects were stronger in those without a diagnosis of dementia (OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.90–1.94) compared with those without a dementia diagnosis (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.32–1.35) who started home health in the final year of life.Conclusions:Receiving home health care in the final years of life is associated with increased hospice use at the end-of-life in Medicare beneficiaries with and without a dementia diagnosis.

Acute care hospitals are challenged to provide efficient, high-quality care to children who have medically complex conditions and may require weeks or months for recovery. Although the use of home health care (HHC) and facility-based postacute care (PAC) after discharge is well documented for adults, to our knowledge, little is known for children. To assess the national prevalence of, characteristics of children discharged to, and variation in use across states of HHC and PAC for children. Retrospective analysis of 2,423,031 US acute care hospital discharges in 2012 for patients ages 0 to 21 years from the nationally representative Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Kids' Inpatient Database. Discharges to HHC (eg, visiting or private-duty home nursing) and PAC (eg, rehabilitation facility) were identified from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Discharge Status Codes. We compared children's characteristics (eg, race/ethnicity and number of chronic conditions) by discharge type using generalized linear regression. The median age of participants was 3 years (interquartile range, 0-13 years), and 45.6% were female. Of 2,423,031 US acute care hospital discharges in 2012 for patients ages 0 to 21 years, 122,673 discharges (5.1%) were to HHC and 26,282 (1.1%) were to PAC facilities. Neonatal care was the most common reason (44.5%, n = 54,589) for acute care hospitalization with discharge to HHC. Nonneonatal respiratory, musculoskeletal, and trauma-related problems, collectively, were the most common reasons for discharge to PAC (42.9%, n = 11,275). When compared with PAC, more discharges to HHC had no chronic condition (34.4% vs 18.0%, P < .001) and fewer discharges to HHC had 4 or more chronic conditions (22.5% vs 37.7%, P < .001). In multivariable analysis, Hispanic children were less likely to use PAC (0.8% vs 1.1%; odds ratio [OR], 0.9 [95% CI, 0.8-0.9]) or HHC (3.3% vs 5.5%; OR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.7-0.8]) compared with other children. Children with 4 or more chronic conditions compared with no chronic conditions had a higher likelihood of HHC use (11.0% vs 4.4%; OR, 2.9 [95% CI, 2.8-3.0]) and PAC (3.9% vs 0.8%; OR, 4.5 [95% CI, 4.3-4.9]). After case-mix adjustment, there was significant (P < .001) variation across states in HHC (range, 0.4%-24.5%) and PAC (range, 0.4%-4.9%) use. Home health care and PAC use after discharge for hospitalized children is infrequent, even for children with multiple chronic conditions. It varies significantly by race/ethnicity and across states. Further investigation is needed to assess reasons for this variation and to determine for which children HHC and PAC are most effective.

Objective: Home health care (HHC) is a support tool to transition patients after discharge and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the U.S. However, little is known regarding the impact of HHC on AMI patients. We sought to identify predictors of readmissions among AMI patients, characteristics of those who receive HHC and investigate the association of HHC with readmission. Methods: We queried the National Readmission Database (NRD) (January 2012 - December 2014), to identify patients discharged after AMI and selected patients who were discharged home with (HHC+) and without HHC (HHC-). We reported national estimates with survey methods with weights provided in our data. After univariate exploratory analyses, we developed a regression model to identify the probability of each patient to receive HHC. From the propensity score, we calculated average treatment on the treated (ATT) weights. These ATT weights were included in the logistic regression model to determine the impact of HHC on readmission after adjusting for available clinical confounders. We considered post-weighting standardized differences &lt;10% as appropriate for our ATT model. To determine clinical factors associated with readmission, we also performed a multi-variable logistic regression with readmission as the end-point. All results were reported as risk ratios (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Between January 2012 to December 2014, 406,237 patients were treated for AMI and discharged home with or without HHC. Among these 9.4% (38,215) received HHC. HHC+ patients were older (mean age 77 ± 11 vs 60 ±12 years p&lt;0.001), more likely to be female (53.6% vs. 26.9%, p &lt;0.001), and have cancer (3.7% vs 1.3%, p &lt;0.001), congestive heart failure (5.7% vs. 0.5%, p &lt;0.001), chronic pulmonary disease (23.2% vs. 12.7%, p &lt;0.001), chronic kidney disease (26.9% vs 6.9%, p &lt;0.001), diabetes (35.6% vs. 26.7%, p &lt;0.001), hypertension (70.7% vs. 64.8%, p &lt;0.001) and peripheral vascular disease (14.6% vs 6.4%, p &lt;0.001). Patients readmitted after MI were more likely to be older and have diabetes (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.37-1.48), CHF (RR 5.89, CI 5.55-6.26) or COPD (RR 1.59, 1.52-1.65). Unadjusted 30-day readmission rate was 20.9% for HHC+ and 8.2% for HHC- patients. Propensity-weighted adjustment for covariates yielded 36,979 HHC+ patients and 37,785 HHC- patients. Adjusted risk rations (RR) for 30-day readmission were computed using ATT weights, and HHC+ patients had significantly lower readmission risk (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 - 0.96) compared to HHC- (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04 - 1.21; p &lt; 0.001) Conclusion: In the United States, a small proportion of patients receive home health care after discharge post-AMI. Older, females and those with diabetes or heart failure are more likely to receive home health care. Use of home health care may be associated with lower 30-day readmission rates after AMI.

Using 1994 National Long Term Care Survey data, we estimated logistic regressions of formal and informal home health care use and hours. Home health care use and intensity were differentially impacted by chronic conditions, are higher for Medicaid enrollees and rural or small town residents, but lower for HMO enrollees. Decreases in the probability of home health care use increased informal instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) support four hours and decreased informal activities of daily living (ADL) support eight hours weekly. IADL caregiving substituted for formal care, but ADL caregiving declined with reductions in formal care. Public policy reducing formal home health care access may reduce informal ADL caregiving and increase informal IADL caregiving, producing net declines in support.