Disparities in first evaluation of infants with cystic fibrosis since implementation of newborn screening

Abstract

ObjectiveWe evaluated whether implementation of cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screening (NBS) leads to equitable timeliness of initial evaluation. We compared age at first event (AFE, age at sweat test, encounter and/or care episode) between infants categorized as Black/African American, American Indian/ Native Alaskan, Asian, and/or Hispanic and/or other (Group 1) to White and not Hispanic infants (Group 2). MethodsThis retrospective cohort study from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) included infants born 2010-2018. Race and ethnicity categories followed US Census definitions. The primary outcome was AFE; the secondary outcome was weight for age (WFA) z-score averaged 12 to < 24 months. We compared distributions by Wilcoxon rank-sum test and proportions by Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. A nested cohort study used a linear mixed effects model of variables that affect WFA, chosen a priori, to evaluate associations with 1-year WFA z-score. ResultsAmong 6354 infants, 21% were in Group 1. Group 1 median AFE was 31 days (IQR 19, 49) and Group 2 was 22 days (IQR 14,36) (p< .001). Median WFA z-score at 1-2 years was lower in Group 1. In 3017 infants with complete data on variables of interest, AFE, Black race, CFTR variant class I-III, prematurity and public insurance were associated with lower 1-year WFA z-score. ConclusionsDifferences in AFE for infants with CF from historically marginalized groups may exacerbate long standing health disparities. We speculate that inequitable identification of CFTR gene variants and/or bias may influence timeliness of evaluation after an out-of-range NBS.