Abstract

• Unethical behavior is usually associated with the risk of negative consequences. • However, the experimental literature so far focused mainly on environments that involve no fines. • We study ethical behavior of individuals and small groups in a compliance setting. • Our results show that groups are clearly less compliant than individuals. • The risk of being detected is the most important aspect in the group communication. Unethical behavior in organizations is usually associated with the risk of negative consequences for the organization and for the involved managers if being detected. The existing experimental literature in economics has so far focused mainly on the analysis of unethical behavior in environments that involve no fines or similar monetary consequences. In the current paper, we use a tax compliance framework to study (un-)ethical behavior of individuals and small groups. Our results show that groups are clearly less compliant than individuals. The risk of being detected is the most important aspect in the group communication process when deciding on compliance.

Highlights

  • Consider an organization that decides on the implementation of provisions of labor laws or on the treatment of tax-relevant circumstances

  • The most severe cases make it to the public, but there is a continuum of norm violations in terms of severity and impact, meaning that norm-violating behavior in organization is a problem on many levels

  • We analyze the foundations of group decisions when there is a tradeoff between following a moral norm, resulting in earning smaller profits, and violating the norm, leading to higher profits, with a chance that the norm violation is detected and causing punishment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Consider an organization that decides on the implementation of provisions of labor laws or on the treatment of tax-relevant circumstances Such decisions often involve a tradeoff between following the provisions tightly, or deviating from the provisions in relevant aspects to increase profits at the risk of getting detected and having to pay fines or face other forms of punishment. Three elements of such decisions in organizations are crucial: compliance with a (moral) norm, risk of detection, and joint decision making in a group or team.

Related Literature and Hypothesis
Risk-Taking Behavior of Individual versus Group Decision Makers
Lying and Cheating Behavior of Individual versus Group Decision Makers
Empirical hypothesis
Decision Task and Payoff Functions
Individual and Group Setting
Experimental Protocol
Sample and Data
Results
Result
Types of Decision Makers in Treatment I-G-I
Group Composition in Treatment I-G-I
Arguments in the Group Chat
Summary and Conclusion
Tables and Figures
Regressions A3 Types of Decision Makers in Treatment I-G-I A4 Codebook
Instructions for Part 2
Instructions for Part 3
Regressions
Codebook
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.