Abstract

Information economics offers a complementary framework relative to transaction cost economics to study corporate strategy. Nevertheless, the existing theory suffers from the lack of an argument to differentiate various remedies for contractual hazards when multiple remedies are available. We develop the argument that although both publicity via equity market and strategic alliances can serve as remedies for the asymmetric information problem in M&As, the different mechanisms underlying the two remedies suggest that only equity market is capable of overcoming the search problem in M&As. Consistent with the argument, the empirical evidence shows that firms rely on equity market and strategic alliances to mitigate the valuation problem associated with acquisitions of highly intangible targets. However, firms tend to use the equity market rather than strategic alliances to address the search problem associated with high spatial dispersion of exchange partners.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.