Abstract
Losses from hard rot, measured by an arbitrary disease index, were reduced by treating the dehusked corms before planting with mercuric chloride (with or without the addition of 10% hydrochloric acid), mercurous chloride (calomel), three proprietary mercury compounds (Aretan, Uspulun and Ceresan) and one proprietary non‐mercury compound (Folosan). Calomel was the least effective. All the treatments were relatively less effective when corms with definite lesions were treated.The weight of clean corms produced per old corm planted (weight index) was usually increased by all the fungicides tried, but calomel and Ceresan were less satisfactory than the others.Mercuric chloride (3 hr. steep in a 0.1% solution) was not rendered more effective by the addition of hydrochloric acid nor by a preliminary dip in methylated spirits to facilitate wetting, while the addition of a proprietary wetting compound (Agral) was definitely harmful to the corms and usually less effective than mercuric chloride alone. Increase in time of steeping or concentration of mercuric chloride was not beneficial and was sometimes harmful. Reduction in time of steeping to 1 hr. gave promising results.Treatment in November had some advantages over treatment in March.All the mercury compounds tended to delay flowering, this being most marked in the presence of the wetting compound. Stunted foliage and poor quality flowers resulted from the use of Ceresan.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.