Disease Activity and Therapeutic Response to Pegcetacoplan for Geographic Atrophy Identified by Deep Learning-Based Analysis of OCT

Abstract

PurposeTo quantify morphological changes of the photoreceptors (PR) and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) layers under pegcetacoplan therapy in geographic atrophy (GA) using deep learning-based analysis of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. DesignPost-hoc longitudinal image analysis SubjectsPatients with GA due to age-related macular degeneration from two prospective randomized phase III clinical trials (OAKS and DERBY) MethodsDeep learning-based segmentation of RPE loss and PR degeneration, defined as loss of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) layer on OCT, over 24 months on SD-OCT images Main outcome measuresChange in the mean area of RPE loss and EZ loss over time in the pooled sham arms and the monthly (PM)/every other month (PEOM) treatment arms Results897 eyes of 897 patients were included. There was a therapeutic reduction of RPE loss growth by 22%/20% in OAKS and 27%/21% in DERBY for PM/PEOM compared to sham, respectively, at 24 months. The reduction on the EZ level was significantly higher with 53%/46% in OAKS and 47%/46% in DERBY for PM/PEOM compared to sham at 24 months. The baseline EZ-RPE difference had an impact on disease activity and therapeutic response. The therapeutic benefit for RPE loss growth increased with larger EZ-RPE difference quartiles from 21.9%, 23.1%, 23.9% to 33.6% for PM vs. sham (all p<0.01) and from 13.6% (p=0.11), 23.8%, 23.8% to 20.0% for PEOM vs. sham (p<0.01) in quartiles 1,2,3 and 4, respectively, at 24 months. Regarding EZ layer maintenance, the therapeutic reduction of loss increased from 14.8% (p=0.09), 33.3%, 46.6% to 77.8% (p<0.0001) between PM and sham and from 15.9% (p=0.08), 33.8%, 52.0% to 64.9% (p<0.0001) between PEOM and sham for quartiles 1-4 at 24 months. ConclusionOCT-based AI analysis objectively identifies and quantifies PR and RPE degeneration in GA. Reductions in further PR degeneration consistent with EZ loss on OCT are even higher than the effect on RPE loss in phase 3 trials of pegcetacoplan treatment. The EZ-RPE difference has a strong impact on disease progression and therapeutic response. Identification of patients with higher EZ-RPE loss difference may become an important criterion for the management of GA secondary to AMD.