Abstract

AbstractThe introduction of the disaster life cycle in 1979 was a milestone in disaster management practice. Its four phases of a disaster, which were the basis for comprehensive emergency management (CEM), have been widely used by practitioners and researchers. However, the literature shows that the CEM model does not fulfill the requirements of an analytical framework, and field experience shows that it does not reflect all managerial aspects. Recognizing the need for an alternative approach—and focusing on managerial aspects—the authors introduce the concept of disaster-function management, placed within classical management theory, where the phases of CEM have been replaced by functions. Based on theoretical arguments as well as empirical considerations, the authors suggest eight functions, each characterized by an associated objective describing the common aim of the collective efforts to be managed within that function. The authors also contribute to the discussion of theory for the management of di...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.