Direct Percutaneous Abdominal Venous Access for Endovascular Therapy.

This study was designed to describe the precise venous anatomy of the right colon, which is especially important for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Fifty-eight adult cadavers were dissected to define the three major venous tributaries of the right colon: the ileocolic vein, right colic vein, and middle colic vein. Two or three middle colic veins were often present, and the biggest one was designated as the main middle colic vein. The middle colic vein and the right colic vein occasionally formed a common trunk with the right gastroepiploic vein and/or the pancreaticoduodenal vein. This common trunk was defined as the gastrocolic trunk. All 58 cadavers had a single ileocolic vein. All of the ileocolic veins drained into the superior mesenteric vein. The right colic vein was absent in 56.9 percent (33/58), and the other 43.1 percent had a single right colic vein. The right colic vein joined the superior mesenteric vein directly in 56 percent (14/25) and the gastrocolic trunk in 44 percent (11/25). The middle colic vein was the most variable. A single middle colic vein was present in 37.9 percent (22/58), 2 middle colic veins were present in 50 percent (29/58), and 3 middle colic veins were present in 12.1 percent (7/58). The main middle colic vein drained into the superior mesenteric vein directly in 84.5 percent (49/58), whereas 12.1 percent (7/58) drained into the gastrocolic trunk. In two cadavers, there was anomalous drainage of the main middle colic vein to the splenic vein and the inferior mesenteric vein. Forty-three accessory middle colic veins were present in total. These drained into the superior mesenteric vein in 17 cadavers and into the gastrocolic trunk in 23. The gastrocolic trunk was present in 69 percent (40/58), being formed with the right colic vein in 27.5 percent (11/40; 1 was together with an accessory middle colic vein) and with the middle colic vein in 75 percent (30/40; 7 with the main middle colic vein, 23 with the accessory middle colic vein). Venous anatomy of the right colon is highly variable. It is especially important to recognize the lack of direct drainage of the right colic vein to the superior mesenteric vein and the high frequency of the presence of plural middle colic veins and the gastrocolic trunk.

Knowledge of the variants of the anatomical variability of the liver vascular bed can be of critical importance in liver resection, liver transplantation, laparoscopic operations, resection of the pancreas, surgical treatment of portal hypertension The main vessels of the hepatic portal vein system are characterized by pronounced anatomical variability in the formation of the portal vein trunk, the greatest variability is characterized by inferior mesenteric vein. The aim of the investigation was to study the variant anatomy of the inferior mesenteric vein according to multispiral computed tomography. The material was 100 multispiral computed tomograms of the abdominal organs from the archive of the clinics of the Samara State Medical University for 2018-2019. For mathematical modeling and the creation of three-dimensional models based on tomograms of the vascular bed, plugins were used in the programs «Luch» and «Autoplan». Variants of the portal vein formation, the angle of inflow of the inferior mesenteric vein into the superior mesenteric and splenic veins, the distance from the point of confluence of the inferior mesenteric vein to the point of confluence with the portal vein were studied. The study revealed that the inferior mesenteric vein in 40% of cases flows into the splenic vein, in 39% - into the angle of confluence of the superior mesenteric and splenic veins, in 16% - into the superior mesenteric vein. In 5% of cases, the absence of the inferior mesenteric vein was revealed. The angle of fusion of the inferior mesenteric vein with the superior mesenteric vein was statistically significantly greater than the angle of fusion of the inferior mesenteric vein with the splenic vein. The angles were 76.36 ± 1.53 ° and 64.89 ± 3.52 °, respectively (p = 0.004). The length of the common trunk of the inferior mesenteric and splenic veins was significantly greater than the common trunk of the mesenteric veins and amounted to 16.98 ± 1.09 mm and 9.37 ± 0.65 mm (p = 0.001), respectively. Thus, the study showed a high degree of anatomical variability of the inferior mesenteric vein.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to describe the precise venous anatomy of the right colon, which is especially important for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. METHODS: Fifty-eight adult cadavers were dissected to define the three major venous tributaries of the right colon: the ileocolic vein, right colic vein, and middle colic vein. Two or three middle colic veins were often present, and the biggest one was designated as the main middle colic vein. The middle colic vein and the right colic vein occasionally formed a common trunk with the right gastroepiploic vein and/or the pancreaticoduodenal vein. This common trunk was defined as the gastrocolic trunk. RESULTS: All 58 cadavers had a single ileocolic vein. All of the ileocolic veins drained into the superior mesenteric vein. The right colic vein was absent in 56.9 percent (33/58), and the other 43.1 percent had a single right colic vein. The right colic vein joined the superior mesenteric vein directly in 56 percent (14/25) and the gastrocolic trunk in 44 percent (11/25). The middle colic vein was the most variable. A single middle colic vein was present in 37.9 percent (22/58), 2 middle colic veins were present in 50 percent (29/58), and 3 middle colic veins were present in 12.1 percent (7/58). The main middle colic vein drained into the superior mesenteric vein directly in 84.5 percent (49/58), whereas 12.1 percent (7/58) drained into the gastrocolic trunk. In two cadavers, there was anomalous drainage of the main middle colic vein to the splenic vein and the inferior mesenteric vein. Forty-three accessory middle colic veins were present in total. These drained into the superior mesenteric vein in 17 cadavers and into the gastrocolic trunk in 23. The gastrocolic trunk was present in 69 percent (40/58), being formed with the right colic vein in 27.5 percent (11/40; 1 was together with an accessory middle colic vein) and with the middle colic vein in 75 percent (30/40; 7 with the main middle colic vein, 23 with the accessory middle colic vein). CONCLUSION: Venous anatomy of the right colon is highly variable. It is especially important to recognize the lack of direct drainage of the right colic vein to the superior mesenteric vein and the high frequency of the presence of plural middle colic veins and the gastrocolic trunk.

With the introduction of complete mesocolic excision (CME) and the application of laparoscopic technique, surgery for colon cancer has become more standardized and the curative effect has improved [1]. The key points in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy are high ligation of main vessels and root dissection of lymph nodes. The wide range of variations in vascular architecture and intraoperative bleeding are common causes of prolonged surgical time, wound hemorrhage, and even transfer to the opening operation. The superior mesenteric vein (SMV) is the most important anatomical landmark in CME for the right colon, and guides all the steps of lymph node dissection. The SMV appears as a pale blue bulge on laparoscopy, which enables accurate positioning. The ileocolic vessel pedicle is relatively constant and facilitates accurate positioning. The intersection of the ileocolic vessel pedicle and the SMV is the optimal starting point in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using a medial-to-lateral approach. A sheath with an avascular plane can be reached after opening the SMV vascular sheath, which results in less bleeding and enables vascular root and thorough lymph node dissection. The first step is to manage the ileocolic vessels. The ileocolic artery (ICA) is located anterior to the ileocolic vein (ICV) for about one-third of the incidence. The ileocolic vessels are relatively long and are easy to work with. In the vast majority of cases, the ICV drains into the SMV, and into the gastrocolic trunk (GCT) in about 2.5% of cases. The reported incidence of a right colic artery (RCA) is controversial; the RCA is absent in about 50% of cases and often crosses the SMV. The right colic vein (RCV) usually drains into the GCT, but sometimes drains directly into the SMV. The middle colic vessels have great variability and a close anatomical relationship with the pancreas, duodenum, and GCT. Moreover, the transverse colon and mesentery are long, and root positioning and processing of the middle colic vein (MCV) are relatively difficult. With the SMV and pancreas as anatomic landmarks, it is more feasible to locate the blood vessels in the neck of the pancreas. The middle colic artery (MCA) originates from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and the distance from the inferior border of the pancreas differs slightly in the literature, but is at the most 5cm. Identification of the MCA trunk and branches, as well as the common origin of the MCA and RCA, is of great importance for the maintaining the blood supply during surgery for primary colon cancer. The MCV mainly drains into the SMV and GCT; however, if branching variation drains into the jejunal vein, inferior mesenteric vein, or splenic vein, the effect is serious when a vessel is torn. Isolation of the GCT is the step at which bleeding will likely occur in standard right resection and is a difficult stage of the surgery. The GCT has five origins including the right gastroepiploic vein (RGV), right colic vein (RCV), accessory right colic vein (ARCV), pancreaticduodenal vein (PDV), and MCV, which can have 2, 3, or 4 branches; therefore, familiarity with variants may be helpful to avoid bleeding. Approximately 5-10% of colon cancers at the hepatic flexure have No. 6 group lymph node metastasis, and laparoscopic radical extended right hemicolectomy requires thorough dissection of No. 6 group lymph nodes and the omental arcade 10cm from the pylorus. The inferior arteriovenous vessels are a common source of bleeding, and the RGV can serve as a clue to finding the artery. The core area of laparoscopic radical extended right hemicolectomy includes the pancreatic neck, duodenum, and right gastroepiploic vessels. The difficulty lies with the standard treatment of the GCT. A medial-to-lateral approach is more in line with the principle of no-touch in tumor surgery and is applied from lower to upper, inside to outside, and left to right, for both the vessels and plane of dissection. Familiarity with vascular variation and the management of vessels in key areas are essential for successful surgery.

Objective: To examine the anatomical relationships of tributaries to superior mesenteric artery and vein in surgical procedures. Methods: A prospectively designed observational trial, registried to Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR 1800014610, was conducted in Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital from July 2016 to Decmeber 2018 to record the relationships of ileocolic artery and vein, right colic artery and vein, middle colic artery and vein, and combinations to assemble Henle's trunk, during the laparoscopic operation of radical right colectomy for right colon malignancies. The length of middle colic artery, length of Henle's trunk, and distance from Henle's trunk to the inferior margin of pancreatic head to duodenum were measured during operation. A total of 100 patients, 52 male and 48 female, with right colon cancer, who underwent radical right colectomy, were enrolled in present study from July 2016 to December 2018, with age of (61.0±12.3) years (range: 31 to 82 years), and body mass index of (23.3±3.5) kg/m(2) (range: 16.0 to 34.2 kg/m(2)). Results: The ileocolic artery and vein presented as rates of 97.0% (97/100, 95%CI: 91.5% to 99.4%, the same below) and 98.0% (98/100, 93.0% to 99.8%), respectively. The ileocolic vein ran ventrally in 51 of 97 patients (52.6%, 42.7% to 62.5%). The right colic artery, which raised from superior mesenteric artery directly, was found in 42 of 100 patients (42.0%, 32.3% to 51.7%); and the right colic vein drained directly into superior mesenteric vein in 19 of 100 patients (19.0%, 11.3% to 26.7%). The presence of middle colic artery and vein were 95.0% (95/100, 90.7% to 99.3%) and 90.0% (90/100, 84.1% to 95.9%) respectively. The average length of middle colic artery, from its origin to bifurcation into right and left branches, was (2.6±1.6) cm (range: 0.1 to 7.2 cm). All the dissected middle colic vein drained into superior mesenteric vein (87.8% (79/90), 81.0% to 94.6%) and Henle's trunk (12.2% (11/90), 5.4% to 19.0%). Henle's trunk was found in 93 of 100 patients (93.0%, 88.0% to 98.0%), with average length of (1.0±0.6) cm (range: 0.1 to 2.4 cm). The distance between Henle's trunk to the inferior margin of pancreatic head was (2.7±0.7) cm (range: 1.3 to 4.5 cm). More than half of the Henle's trunk were composed of 3 tributaries (54.8% (53/93), 40.8% to 61.2%). The most frequently discovered tributaries to form Henle's trunk were right gastroepiploic vein (98.0% (98/100), 93.0% to 99.8%), superior right colic vein (82.0% (82/100), 74.5% to 89.5%), and superior anterior pancreaticoduodenal vein (78.0% (78/100), 69.9% to 86.1%). In present study, the right branch of middle colic vessels was often found to run closely with Henle's trunk, veins drained from small intestine could be found to run over superior mesenteric artery to converge into superior mesenteric vein. There were 2 incidences, injuries to Henle's trunk and middle colic vein, happened during the operation, which were overcomed by bipolar coagulation and dividing the vessels. Conclusions: Ileocolic vessels and middle colic vessels could be used as landmarks for laparoscopic surgery based on their constant anatomical existence. In contrast, the chances are rare for the presence of right colic artery or right colic vein. Nearly half of the Henle's trunk was consisted of right gastroepiploic vein, superior right colic vein and superior anterior pancreaticoduodenal vein. Exceptional cautions should be made for the variations of the Henle's trunk during the operation.

Background. We investigated the occluded essential vessel tributaries, both arterial and venous, occluded superior mesenteric vein and artery in rats, consequent noxious syndrome, peripherally and centrally. As therapy, we hypothesized the rapidly activated alternative bypassing pathways, arterial and venous, and the stable gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157 since it rapidly alleviated venous occlusion syndromes. Methods. Assessments were performed for 30 min (gross recording, venography, ECG, pressure, microscopy, biochemistry, and oxidative stress), including portal hypertension, caval hypertension, aortal hypotension, and centrally, the superior sagittal sinus hypertension; systemic arterial and venous thrombosis, ECG disturbances, MDA-tissue increase, the multiple organs lesions, heart, lung, liver, kidney and gastrointestinal tract, including brain (swelling, and cortex (cerebral, cerebellar), hypothalamus/thalamus, hippocampus lesions). Rats received BPC 157 medication (10 µg/kg, 10 ng/kg) intraperitoneally at 1 min ligation-time. Results. BPC 157 rapidly activated collateral pathways. These collateral loops were the superior mesenteric vein-inferior anterior pancreaticoduodenal vein-superior anterior pancreaticoduodenal vein-pyloric vein-portal vein pathway, an alternative pathway toward inferior caval vein via the united middle colic vein and inferior mesenteric vein through the left colic vein, and the inferior anterior pancreaticoduodenal artery and inferior mesenteric artery. Consequently, BPC 157 counteracted the superior sagittal sinus, portal and caval hypertension, aortal hypotension, progressing venous and arterial thrombosis peripherally and centrally, ECG disturbances attenuated. Markedly, the multiple organs lesions, heart, lung, liver, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract, in particular, as well as brain lesions, and oxidative stress in tissues were attenuated. Conclusions. BPC 157 therapy rapidly recovered rats, which have complete occlusion of the superior mesenteric vein and artery.

The degree of involvement of blood flow in the superior mesenteric vein and inferior mesenteric vein in the formation of oesophageal varices is not known. We have developed a method by which the contributions of these veins to portal blood flow can be evaluated simultaneously in a relatively non-invasive way. An enteric-coated capsule containing [123I]iodoamphetamine (IMP) is given by mouth and 3 h later [123I]IMP is instilled into the rectum. The data obtained are treated by computer to calculate the portal shunt index via the inferior and superior mesenteric veins. In chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis, when varices were absent, the difference in these indices was not significant. In the presence of varices, the portal shunt index via the inferior mesenteric vein was significantly higher than that via the superior mesenteric vein. It was suggested that the contribution of blood flow in the inferior mesenteric vein the portal/splenic axis is important in the formation of varices.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate thin-section helical CT for the frequency of visualization of the peripancreatic veins, the venous anatomy at the head of the pancreas, and variations of the venous anatomy. We performed 30-sec helical CT of the pancreas with one breath-hold and a 3-mm scanning collimation in 50 patients. The scan was started 60 sec after injection of an i.v. contrast medium at the rate of 2 ml/sec (total amount of contrast medium, 100 ml). The axial scan data were reviewed for the following information: the frequency of CT visualization of the peripancreatic veins (anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein, first jejunal vein, gastrocolic trunk, inferior mesenteric vein, left gastric vein, middle colic vein, posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein, right colic vein, and right gastroepipolic vein) and the anatomic relationship between the large portal venous system (portal vein, superior mesenteric vein, and splenic vein) and its tributaries. The frequency of visualization on CT of each vessel was gastrocolic trunk, 100%; right gastroepiploic vein, 100%; first jejunal vein, 96%; inferior mesenteric vein, 88%; left gastric vein, 80%; posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein, 72%; middle colic vein, 72%; right colic vein, 64%; and anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein, 50%. The anatomic relationship between the large portal venous system and its tributaries was as follows: The left gastric vein drained into the splenic vein-portal vein confluence (46%), into the splenic vein (32%), and into the portal vein (22%); the inferior mesenteric vein drained into the splenic vein (46%), the splenic vein-superior mesenteric vein confluence (25%), and the superior mesenteric vein (29%). The posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein drained into the portal vein above the splenic vein-portal vein confluence (mean distance, 0.3 cm). The middle colic vein, gastrocolic trunk, and first jejunal vein drained into the superior mesenteric vein below the splenic vein-portal vein confluence (mean distances of 2.4 cm, 3.0 cm, and 3.7 cm, respectively). Thin-section helical CT scans provide good visualization of the peripancreatic veins.

- BACKGROUND:Knowledge of the portal system and its anatomical variations aids to preventsurgical adverse events. The portal vein is usually made by the confluence ofthe superior mesenteric and splenic veins, together with their main tributaries,the inferior mesenteric, left gastric, and pancreaticoduodenal veins; however,anatomical variations are frequent.AIM: This article presents a literature review regarding previously describedanatomical variations of the portal venous system and their frequency.METHODS: A systematic review of primary studies was performed in the databasesPubMed, SciELO, BIREME, LILACS, Embase, ScienceDirect, andScopus. Databases were searched for the following key terms:Anatomy, Portal vein, Mesenteric vein, Formation, Variation,Variant anatomic, Splenomesenteric vein, Splenic veintributaries, and Confluence.RESULTS: We identified 12 variants of the portal venous bed, representing differentunions of the splenic vein, superior mesenteric vein, and inferiormesenteric vein. Thomson classification of the end of 19th century refers tothe three most frequent variants, with type I as predominant (M=47%),followed by type III (M=27.8%) and type II (M=18.6%).CONCLUSION: Thomson classification of variants is the most well-known, accounting forover 90% of portal venous variant found in clinical practice, inasmuch asthe sum of the three junctions are found in over 93% of the patients. Eventhough rarer and accounting for less than 7% of variants, the other ninereported variations will occasionally be found during many abdominaloperations.

This study evaluated the venous variations of the right colon using preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT), and to investigate its usefulness in laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right colon cancer. 3D-CT was performed prior to surgery in 81 consecutive patients with right colon cancer. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy was performed without conversion to open surgery in all cases (100 %). All 81 patients had a single ileocolic vein (ICV). The ICV flowed into the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) in 98 % of patients and the gastrocolic trunk (GCT) in 2 % of patients. The right colic vein (RCV) was absent in 6 % of patients. One RCV was present in 88 % of patients and two were present in 6 % of patients. The main RCV flowed into the GCT in 84 % of patients and the SMV in 10 % of patients. The superior RCV was present in 21 % of patients, and all cases flowed into the GCT. One middle colic vein (MCV) was present in 49 % of patients, two in 46 %, and three in 5 % of patients. The main MCV flowed into the SMV in 68 % of patients, GCT in 20 %, jejunal vein in 6 %, inferior mesenteric vein in 5 %, and the splenic vein in 1 % of patients. The GCT was present in 88 % of patients. Although the venous tributaries of the right colon are variable, preoperative 3D-CT is informative and helpful for surgeons performing laparoscopic CME for right colon cancer.

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of radical resection with individualized surgical approach for borderline resectable pancreatic head carcinoma. Methods The retrospective descriptive study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 54 patients with borderline resectable pancreatic head carcinoma who underwent radical resection with individualized surgical approach in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2015 to January 2018 were collected. There were 37 males and 17 females, aged from 37 to 73 years, with a median age of 59 years. For venous type borderline resectable pancreatic head carcinoma, surgery for pancreatic head carcinoma and (or) pancreatic head and neck carcinoma was performed via inferior mesenteric vein, and surgery for pancreatic uncinate process carcinoma was performed via inferior colon artery. For arterial type borderline resectable pancreatic head carcinoma, surgery for pancreatic head carcinoma and (or) pancreatic head and neck carcinoma was performed via medial uncinate artery, and surgery for pancreatic uncinate process carcinoma was performed via left posterior artery. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) postoperative complications; (3) postoperative pathological examination; (4) follow-up. Patients were followed up by outpatient examination or telephone interview once every 3 months to detect survival up to March 2019. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented by Mean±SD. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented by M (range), and count data were represented by absolute numbers or percentage. Kaplan-meier method was used to draw the survival curve and calculate the survival rate. Results (1) Surgical situations: all the 54 patients underwent expanded pancreatoduodenectomy combined with superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (SMV/PV) resection, including 15 via inferior mesenteric vein, 20 via inferior colon artery, 12 via medial uncinate artery, and 7 via left posterior artery. The operation time was (320±83)minutes, and the volume of intraoperative blood loss was (865±512)mL. (2) Postoperative complications: of 54 cases, 28 had postoperative complications, including 13 with grade 1 Clavien-Dindo complications, 12 with grade 2 Clavien-Dindo complications, 3 with grade 3 or above Clavien-Dindo complications. One of the 28 patients with postoperative complications died and 27 were improved after symptomatic and supportive treatment. (3) Postoperative pathological examination: of 54 patients, 31 had R0 resection and 23 had R1 resection. In the 23 patients with R1 resection, 5 underwent surgery via the inferior mesenteric vein (4 with involvement of pancreatic anterior surface, 1 with involvement of both pancreatic anterior and posterior surface), 9 underwent surgery via the inferior colon artery (2 with involvement of both pancreatic anterior and posterior surface, 2 with involvement of superior mesenteric artery margin, 2 with involvement of pancreatic posterior surface, 2 with involvement of pancreatic anterior surface, 1 with involvement of superior mesenteric artery margin and pancreatic posterior surface), 5 underwent surgery via the medial uncinate process artery (2 with involvement of superior mesenteric artery margin, 2 with involvement of both pancreatic anterior and posterior surface, 1 with involvement of pancreatic neck transected margin), and 4 underwent surgery via the left posterior artery (3 with involvement of superior mesenteric artery margin, 1 with involvement of both pancreatic anterior and posterior surface). Of 54 patients, 16 had no positive lymph nodes, 26 had 1-3 positive lymph nodes, and 12 had 4 or more positive lymph nodes. The tumor diameter was (3.20±0.14)cm. There were 48 of 54 patients with nerve infiltration, 41 with superior mesenteric vein and/or portal vein infiltration, and 11 with vascular thrombus. There were 17 of 54 patients with high differentiation and medium differentiation, and 37 with low differentiation and undifferentiation. (4) Follow-up: 54 patients were followed up for 1-42 months, with a median time of 19 months. The 1-, 3-year overall survival rate was 78.0%, 11.4%. Conclusion As for the borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer, individualized and customized surgical approach according to the location of tumor and the relationship with blood vessels is helpful to standardize the radical resection and avoid R2 resection. Key words: Pancreatic neoplasms; Pancreatic cancer; Borderline resectable; pancreaticoduodenectomy; Surgical approach; R2 resection; Efficacy

To evaluate the safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous mesenteric vein access compared to transsplenic portal vein access for portosystemic shunt placement in patients with portal vein obstruction. Eight patients underwent portosystemic shunt creation through either a transsplenic (n = 4) or transmesenteric (n = 4) approach. The superior or inferior mesenteric vein was percutaneously accessed under ultrasound guidance using a 21G needle and a 4F sheath. Hemostasis at the mesenteric access site was achieved with manual compression. For transsplenic access, sheath sizes between 6 and 8F were used and tract embolization with gelfoam was performed. Portosystemic shunt placement was successful in all patients. While there were no bleeding complications with transmesenteric access, hemorrhagic shock requiring splenic artery embolization occurred in one patient in which the transsplenic approach was used. Ultrasound-guided mesenteric vein access seems feasible and a valid alternative to the transsplenic access in case of portal vein obstruction. Level of Evidence Level 4, case series.

BackgroundThis study aimed to analyze right colonic vascular variability.MethodsThe study included 60 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic radical right colectomy and D3 lymph node dissection for malignant colonic cancer on the ileocecal valve, ascending colon or hepatic flexure (March 2013 to October 2016). The videos of the 60 surgical procedures were collected. Variations of right colonic vascular anatomy were retrospectively analyzed based on 60 high-resolution surgical videos of laparoscopic surgery.ResultsThe superior mesenteric artery and vein were present in all cases; 95.0% (57/60) had the superior mesenteric artery on the left side of the superior mesenteric vein. The ileocolic artery and vein occurred in 96.7% (58/60) and 100% (60/60) of cases, respectively; 50.0% (29/58) had the ileocolic artery passing the superior mesenteric vein anteriorly. Thirty-three (55.0%) cases had a right colic artery, and 2 (3.33%) had a double right colic artery; 90.9% (30/36) had the right colic vein passing anterior to the superior mesenteric artery. Fifty-six (93.3%) cases had a right colic vein; 7 (12.5%) had a right colic vein accompanied by a right colic artery, 66.1% (37/56) had the right colic vein draining into the gastrocolic trunk of Henle, 23.2% (13/56) had the right colic vein directly draining into superior mesenteric vein, and 10.7% (6/56) had one right colic vein draining into the superior mesenteric vein and the other into the gastrocolic trunk of Henle. Fifty-three (88.3%) cases had a gastrocolic trunk of Henle: a gastrocolic trunk in 35.8% (19/53), a gastropancreatic trunk in 9.4% (5/53), and a gastropancreaticocolic trunk in 54.7% (29/53). The frequencies of middle colic artery and vein were respectively 100% (60/60) and 93.3% (56/60).ConclusionsRight colonic vascular variations were classified in Chinese patients. Notable findings included a superior mesenteric artery positioned to the right of the superior mesenteric vein and variation in middle colic artery length. This knowledge may be helpful to colorectal surgeons and could potentially help to improve safety by reducing vascular complications during minimally invasive procedures.

Portal-mesenteric pylephlebitis with hepatic abscesses in a patient with Crohn's disease treated successfully with anticoagulation and antibiotics.

Ruptured retrocecal appendicitis in an adolescent presenting as portal-mesenteric thrombosis and pylephlebitis.