Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency–related variants among Mexican patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.

BackgroundPretherapeutic screening for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is recommended or required prior to the administration of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. However, the best strategy to identify DPD-deficient patients remains elusive.MethodsAmong a nationwide cohort of 5886 phenotyped patients with cancer who were screened for DPD deficiency over a 3 years period, we assessed the characteristics of both DPD phenotypes and DPYD genotypes in a subgroup of 3680 patients who had completed the two tests. The extent to which defective allelic variants of DPYD predict DPD activity as estimated by the plasma concentrations of uracil [U] and its product dihydrouracil [UH2] was evaluated.ResultsWhen [U] was used to monitor DPD activity, 6.8% of the patients were classified as having DPD deficiency ([U] > 16 ng/ml), while the [UH2]:[U] ratio identified 11.5% of the patients as having DPD deficiency (UH2]:[U] < 10). [U] classified two patients (0.05%) with complete DPD deficiency (> 150 ng/ml), and [UH2]:[U] < 1 identified three patients (0.08%) with a complete DPD deficiency. A defective DPYD variant was present in 4.5% of the patients, and two patients (0.05%) carrying 2 defective variants of DPYD were predicted to have low metabolism. The mutation status of DPYD displayed a very low positive predictive value in identifying individuals with DPD deficiency, although a higher predictive value was observed when [UH2]:[U] was used to measure DPD activity. Whole exon sequencing of the DPYD gene in 111 patients with DPD deficiency and a “wild-type” genotype (based on the four most common variants) identified seven heterozygous carriers of a defective allelic variant.ConclusionsFrequent genetic DPYD variants have low performances in predicting partial DPD deficiency when evaluated by [U] alone, and [UH2]:[U] might better reflect the impact of genetic variants on DPD activity. A clinical trial comparing toxicity rates after dose adjustment according to the results of genotyping or phenotyping testing to detect DPD deficiency will provide critical information on the best strategy to identify DPD deficiency.

To the editor, With interest we read the article by Dr Cubero and colleagues, in which they evaluated the safety of tegafur-uracil (UFT®) in five cases with partial dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency [Cubero et al. 2012]. Based on our previous experience [Deenen et al. 2010], however, we would like to express our concern about their conclusion that UFT is a safe alternative for the treatment of patients with partial DPD deficiency. Cubero and colleagues make the erroneous and unproven statement that the presence of uracil in UFT creates an artificial DPD deficiency, and that the DPD activity in patients with normal DPD activity would then be similarly as low as in DPD-deficient patients. This assumption, however, is incorrect. As uracil is a competitive inhibitor of DPD, it competes with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for DPD-mediated metabolism. This does not mean that the activity of DPD is depleted, as suggested by Cubero and colleagues, in contrast, its activity is fully utilized, as well as for the metabolism of uracil, as for the metabolism of 5-FU. We would like to caution that treating patients with partial DPD deficiency with the standard dose of UFT may unnecessarily lead to severe, potentially lethal toxicity. Unlike the cases described by Cubero and colleagues, we could previously describe four cases presenting with comparable severe toxicity profiles upon treatment with UFT as had previously occurred during treatment with capecitabine or 5-FU. In all subjects an underlying partial DPD deficiency was identified by genotype and phenotype analyses [Deenen et al. 2010]. Furthermore, there are several pharmacological lines of argument that support our clinical observation, i.e. that the standard dose of UFT is not safe in (partial) DPD-deficient patients. First, pharmacokinetic studies have shown that DPD remains essential for the metabolism of UFT, with significantly longer half-lives of 5-FU after administration of UFT compared with 5-FU administered intravenously [Ho et al. 1998]. This is due to the presence of uracil in UFT. Since DPD-deficient patients already have longer half-lives of 5-FU than other patients [Mattison et al. 2006], presence of uracil increases its half-life even further. This in turn leads to prolonged and elevated circulating levels of 5-FU, with a subsequently increased risk of 5-FU-induced severe toxicity. Another argument underscoring the importance of normal DPD function in the safe application of UFT, is the experience with S-1. S-1 is another drug combination of tegafur, consisting of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP) and potassium oxonate in a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1. CDHP inhibits DPD 200-fold more potently than does uracil [Shirasaka et al. 1996a, 1996b]. Even after administration of S-1, the primary 5-FU metabolite formed by DPD is observed in significant concentrations in plasma [Kim et al. 2007]. Thus, DPD remains an essential detoxification enzyme of 5-FU, even when its activity is strongly inhibited. The ultimate proof of theory is the occurrence of 18 treatment-related deaths in patients with cancer and herpes zoster given UFT plus the antiviral drug sorivudine [Pharmaceutical Affairs Bureau, 1994]. Subsequent studies in rats showed that a metabolite of sorivudine, (E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)uracil, instantly and irreversibly inactivates DPD by covalent binding, which has been identified as the underlying mechanism of these toxic deaths [Ogura et al. 1998; Okuda et al. 1998]. It is for these arguments that the Summary of Product Characteristics of UFT notes a known DPD deficiency as a contra-indication [Merck Serono, 2011]. The fact that the patients described by Cubero and colleagues did not develop significant toxicity might be due to patient selection, the slightly decreased dose intensity of 90%, or despite their DPYD*2A genotype a DPD enzyme activity within the (lower) range of normal. We are not aware of this, because DPD enzyme activity was not determined in these patients. In summary, we would like to state that standard-dose UFT is not a safe treatment in (partial) DPD-deficient patients. Instead, dose reductions of on average 50% of either capecitabine, 5-FU or UFT with careful monitoring of safety and further dose titration are proposed as the standard of care [Deenen et al. 2011].

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is prevalent in 3-5% of the Caucasian population; however, the frequency of this pharmacogenetic syndrome in the Indian population and other racial and ethnic groups remains to be elucidated. We describe an Indian patient who presented to clinic for the treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma with 5-flurouracil (5-FU) therapy who subsequently was diagnosed with DPD deficiency by using the peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) DPD radioassay. This observation prompted us to examine the data generated from healthy (cancer-free) Indian subjects who were enrolled in a large population study to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the uracil breath test (UraBT) in the detection of DPD deficiency. Thirteen Indian subjects performed the UraBT. UraBT results were confirmed by PBMC DPD radioassay. The Indian cancer patient demonstrated reduced DPD activity (0.11 nmol/min/mg protein) and severe 5-FU toxicities commonly associated with DPD deficiency. Of the 13 Indian subjects [ten men and three women; mean age, 26 years (range: 21-31 years)] enrolled in the UraBT, 12 Indian subjects demonstrated UraBT breath profiles and PBMC DPD activity within the normal range; one Indian subject demonstrated a reduced breath profile and partial DPD deficiency. DPD deficiency is a pharmacogenetic syndrome which is also present in the Indian population. If undiagnosed, the DPD deficiency can lead to death. Future epidemiological studies would be helpful to determine the prevalence of DPD deficiency among racial and ethnic groups, allowing for the optimization of 5-FU chemotherapy.

Is Capecitabine Safe in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency?

521 Background: DPD deficiency is a pharmacogenetic syndrome associated with dose-limiting toxicity to fluoropyrimidines. Oncologists are expected to recognize and diagnose this syndrome, as toxicities could be fatal. Over 40 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and deletions have been identified within the DPYD gene. IVS14+1G&gt;A (DPYD*2A) is the most common (40-50%) and best studied of these SNPs. Yet, it showed a median sensitivity of 30% and is absent in Japanese, Korean and African Americans. Overall, the data on DPYD testing is insufficient to provide enough guidance to diagnose DPD deficiency. Herein we describe our experience with germline pharmacogenomics in patients with DPD deficiency. Methods: Between 2011 and 2015, 35 patients with gastrointestinal malignancies were tested for DPYD mutations; 17 were tested after developing toxicities to treatment and 18 were tested prior to treatment. IVS14+1G&gt;A (DPYD*2A) was tested in all patients. DPYD c.85T&gt;C (DPYD*9A), DPYD c.1679T&gt;G (DPYD*13A), DPYD c.-1590T&gt;C, and DPYD c.2846A&gt;T were tested in 24 patients (69%) only. We explored the association between DPYD mutations and fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Median age was 60 years, 43% were male, 80% were Caucasian and 20% were African American. Capecitabine-based regimens (71%) and 5-Fluorouracil-based regimens (29%). 14 out of 35 patients (40%) had DPYD mutations. Grade 3 toxicities were encountered in 64% of patients with DPYD mutation and 48% of patients with no DPYD mutation. In patients who received full dose fluoropyrimidines (57% of patients with DPYD mutation and 81% of patients with no DPYD mutation), DPYD mutations were associated with a significantly higher rate of grade 3 diarrhea (p=0.026). In patients with DPYD mutation, 2 (14%) had DPYD*A2 mutation and 12 (86%) had DPYD*9A mutation. Conclusions: In patients treated with fluoropyrimidines, the rate of grade 3 diarrhea was significantly higher in patients with mutated DPYD gene. Testing for DPYD*2A alone to diagnose DPD deficiency is suboptimal. Testing for other DPYD mutation variants including DPYD*9A provides a more comprehensive approach. These data should further be validated in prospective clinical trials.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency, a known pharmacogenetic syndrome associated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) toxicity, has been detected in 3% to 5% of the population. Genotypic studies have identified >32 sequence variants in the DPYD gene; however, in a number of cases, sequence variants could not explain the molecular basis of DPD deficiency. Recent studies in cell lines indicate that hypermethylation of the DPYD promoter might down-regulate DPD expression. The current study investigates the role of methylation in cancer patients with an unexplained molecular basis of DPD deficiency. DPD deficiency was identified phenotypically by both enzyme assay and uracil breath test, and genotypically by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. The methylation status was evaluated in PCR products (209 bp) of bisulfite-modified DPYD promoter, using a novel denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography method that distinguishes between methylated and unmethylated alleles. Clinical samples included five volunteers with normal DPD enzyme activity, five DPD-deficient volunteers, and five DPD-deficient cancer patients with a history of 5-FU toxicity. No evidence of methylation was detected in samples from volunteers with normal DPD. Methylation was detected in five of five DPD-deficient volunteers and in three of five of the DPD-deficient cancer patient samples. Of note, one of the two samples from patients with DPD-deficient cancer with no evidence of methylation had the mutation DPYD*2A, whereas the other had DPYD*13. Methylation of the DPYD promoter region is associated with down-regulation of DPD activity in clinical samples and should be considered as a potentially important regulatory mechanism of DPD activity and basis for 5-FU toxicity in cancer patients.

Treating patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency with fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy since the onset of routine prospective testing—The experience of a large oncology center in the United Kingdom

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency (McKusick 274270) is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by thymine-uraciluria in homozygous-deficient patients and associated with a variable clinical phenotype. Cancer patients with this defect should not be treated with the usual dose of 5-fluorouracil because of the expected lethal toxicity. In addition, heterozygosity for mutations in the DPD gene increases the risk of toxicity in cancer patients treated with this drug. Sequence analysis in a patient with complete DPD deficiency, previously shown to be heterozygous for the delta C1897 frame-shift mutation, revealed the presence of a novel missense mutation, R235W. Expression of this novel mutation and previously identified missense mutations C29R and R886H in Escherichia coli showed that both C29R and R235W lead to a mutant DPD protein without significant residual enzymatic activity. The R886H mutation, however, resulted in about 25% residual enzymatic activity and is unlikely to be responsible for the DPD-deficient phenotype. We show that the E. coli expression system is a valuable tool for examining DPD enzymatic variants. In addition, two new patients who were both heterozygous for the C29R mutation and the common splice donor site mutation were identified. Only one of these patients showed convulsive disorders during childhood, whereas the other showed no clinical phenotype, further illustrating the lack of correlation between genotype and phenotype in DPD deficiency.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is critical in the predisposition to 5-fluorouracil dose-related toxicity. We recently characterized the phenotypic [2-(13)C]uracil breath test (UraBT) with 96% specificity and 100% sensitivity for identification of DPD deficiency. In the present study, we characterize the relationships among UraBT-associated breath (13)CO(2) metabolite formation, plasma [2-(13)C]dihydrouracil formation, [2-(13)C]uracil clearance, and DPD activity. An aqueous solution of [2-(13)C]uracil (6 mg/kg) was orally administered to 23 healthy volunteers and 8 cancer patients. Subsequently, breath (13)CO(2) concentrations and plasma [2-(13)C]dihydrouracil and [2-(13)C]uracil concentrations were determined over 180 minutes using IR spectroscopy and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, respectively. Pharmacokinetic variables were determined using noncompartmental methods. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) DPD activity was measured using the DPD radioassay. The UraBT identified 19 subjects with normal activity, 11 subjects with partial DPD deficiency, and 1 subject with profound DPD deficiency with PBMC DPD activity within the corresponding previously established ranges. UraBT breath (13)CO(2) DOB(50) significantly correlated with PBMC DPD activity (r(p) = 0.78), plasma [2-(13)C]uracil area under the curve (r(p) = -0.73), [2-(13)C]dihydrouracil appearance rate (r(p) = 0.76), and proportion of [2-(13)C]uracil metabolized to [2-(13)C]dihydrouracil (r(p) = 0.77; all Ps < 0.05). UraBT breath (13)CO(2) pharmacokinetics parallel plasma [2-(13)C]uracil and [2-(13)C]dihydrouracil pharmacokinetics and are an accurate measure of interindividual variation in DPD activity. These pharmacokinetic data further support the future use of the UraBT as a screening test to identify DPD deficiency before 5-fluorouracil-based therapy.

Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is a primary component of many solid tumor treatment regimens, particularly those for gastrointestinal malignancies. Approximately one-third of patients receiving fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapies experience serious adverse effects. This risk is substantially higher in patients carrying DPYD genetic variants, which cause reduced fluoropyrimidine metabolism and inactivation (ie, dihydropyridine dehydrogenase [DPD] deficiency). Despite the known relationship between DPD deficiency and severe toxicity risk, including drug-related fatalities, pretreatment DPYD testing is not standard of care in the United States. We developed an in-house DPYD genotyping test that detects 5 clinically actionable variants associated with DPD deficiency, and genotyped 827 patients receiving fluoropyrimidines, of which 49 (6%) were identified as heterozygous carriers. We highlight 3 unique cases: (1) a patient with a false-negative result from a commercial laboratory that only tested for the c.1905 + 1G>A (*2A) variant, (2) a White patient in whom the c.557A>G variant (typically observed in people of African ancestry) was detected, and (3) a patient with the rare c.1679T>G (*13) variant. Lastly, we evaluated which DPYD variants are detected by commercial laboratories offering DPYD genotyping in the United States and found 6 of 13 (46%) did not test for all 5 variants included on our panel. We estimated that 20.4% to 81.6% of DPYD heterozygous carriers identified on our panel would have had a false-negative result if tested by 1 of these 6 laboratories. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of the diagnostic tests from these laboratories ranged from 18.4% to 79.6% and 95.1% to 98.7%, respectively. These cases underscore the importance of comprehensive DPYD genotyping to accurately identify patients with DPD deficiency who may require lower fluoropyrimidine doses to mitigate severe toxicities and hospitalizations. Clinicians should be aware of test limitations and variability in variant detection by commercial laboratories, and seek assistance by pharmacogenetic experts or available resources for test selection and result interpretation.

P-198 Prevalence of deleterious DPYD variants in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies: Real-world data from a single institution in Italy

AimsTreatment with dihydropyrimidines poses a significant risk of serious adverse reactions for patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency. This study seeks to analyse the correlation between DPD deficiency and plasmatic...

The correlation between DPYD*9A (c.85T>C) genotype and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency clinical phenotype is controversial. Reference laboratories either did not perform DPYD*9A genotyping or have stopped DPYD*9A genotyping and limited genotyping to high-risk variants (DPYD*2A, DPYD*13 and DPYD*9B) only. This study explored DPYD*9A genotype and clinical phenotype correlation in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies treated with fluoropyrimidines. Between 2011 and 2017, 67 patients with GI malignancies were genotyped for DPYD variants. Fluoropyrimidines-associated toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis. DPYD variants were identified in 17 out of 67 (25%) patients. One patient was homozygous for DPYD*9A variant and one patient was double heterozygous for DPYD*9A and DPYD*9B variants. In patients with identified DPYD variants, 13/17 (76%) patients had DPYD*9A variant, 3/17 (18%) patients had DPYD*2A variant and 2/17 (12%) patient had DPYD*9B variant. Only patients genotyped prior to 2015 were genotyped for DPYD*9A variant (N=28). Of those, 13/28 patients (46%) had DPYD*9A variant. Grade 3-4 diarrhea was associated with DPYD*9A variant in patients treated with full dose fluoropyrimidines (P=0.0055). In our cohort, DPYD*9A variant was the most common diagnosed variant. The correlation between DPYD*9A genotype and DPD deficiency in clinical phenotype was noticeable in patients who received full dose fluoropyrimidines as they all experienced grade 3-4 toxicities (diarrhea).

The cytotoxic effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is mediated by the inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS), however, at the same time 5-FU is catabolized by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Efficacy of 5-FU may therefore depend on the TS and DPD activity and on pharmacogenetic factors influencing these enzymes. Our aims were (1) to determine the distribution of DPD activity, the frequency of DPD deficiency and the DPD (IVS14+1G>A) mutation in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, and study the relationship between DPD deficiency and toxicity of 5-FU; (2) to investigate the influence of TS polymorphisms and DPD activity on the survival of CRC patients receiving 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy. The frequency of DPD deficiency was determined by radiochemical methods in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of 764 CRC patients treated with 5-FU. The relationship between the TS polymorphisms, DPD activity and the disease-free and overall survival was studied in 166 CRC patients receiving 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy. TS polymorphisms were determined in the DNA samples separated from the PBMCs, by PCR-PAGE and PCR-RFLP-PAGE (restriction fragment length polymorphism) methods. Low DPD values (<10 pmol/min/106 PBMCs) were demonstrated in 160/764 patients (20.9%), and of those DPD deficiency (<5 pmol/min/106 PBMCs) was verified in 38 patients (4.9%). In the latter group severe (>Gr 3) toxicity was found in 87%. The prevalence of the DPD IVS14+1G>A mutation among the 38 DPD-deficient patients was 7.8% (3/38) and was accompanied by severe Gr 4 toxic symptoms (neutropenia, mucositis, diarrhea). TS polymorphisms showed a relationship with the survival of CRC patients. It is important to mention that by combining the 3-3 genotypes of 5'-TSER and 3'-TSUTR polymorphisms the obtained 8 genotype combinations showed significantly different Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The evaluation of these curves with Cox regression analysis resulted in two prognostically different groups: "A" good prognosis (RR<1) and "B" bad prognosis (RR>1). The disease-free- and overall survival of these two groups were significantly different. DPD activity also showed correlation with the survival; patients with DPD activity <10 pmol/min/106 PBMCs showed significantly longer disease-free and overall survival. The determination of DPD activity proved to be a more valuable parameter in the evaluation of serious 5-FU-related toxicity compared to the IVS14+1G>A mutation analysis. According to the Cox multivariate analysis the combination of germline TS polymorphisms and DPD activity is/an independent prognostic marker of survival in CRC patients treated with adjuvant 5-FU therapy.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency with a defect of the pyrimidine catabolic pathway has recently become the focus of considerable attention, due to the severe 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) toxicities occurring in DPD deficiency patients. Studies also suggest that 5-FU toxicities could occur in another pyrimidine metabolic disorder, dihydropyrimidinuria (DHPuria). This study shows that urinary dihydrothymine (DHT) and thymine (THY) are useful indexes for detection of DPD deficiency and DHPuria. We measured urinary DHT and THY in 276 Japanese adults to establish reference ranges. When males and females were compared, both DHT and THY levels were found to be significantly higher in females. The reference ranges (mean +/- SD with logarithmic values) for males were found to be 1.56-5.70 micromol/g of creatinine for DHT and 0.40-1.47 micromol/g of creatinine for THY. The reference ranges for females were found to be 1.89-8.33 micromol/g of creatinine for DHT and 0.58-2.30 micromol/g of creatinine for THY. In addition to this study we analyzed a DPD deficiency case and a DHPuria case. In the DPD deficiency case, the THY concentrations of all urine samples were out of the reference range. However, uracil levels in most of the samples were within the normal range. The DHPuria case excreted large amounts of DHT and dihydrouracil, both out of the normal range.