Abstract

This paper explores the Supreme Court of Canada's increasingly nuanced privacy jurisprudence through the context of R v Reeves, 2018 SCC 56, a decision cementing constitutional privacy protections in shared devices. The implications of approach adopted in R v Reeves for a number of upcoming privacy decisions are examined, ultimately touching on undercover police operations, Canada's voyeurism offence and the privacy protections an invited visitor can expect when law enforcement unlawfully enter his host's backyard.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.