Abstract

Over the last decade, a variety of noninvasive techniques have been developed to monitor therapeutic ultrasound procedures in support of safety or efficacy assessments. One class of methods employs diagnostic ultrasound arrays to sense acoustic emissions, thereby providing a means to passively detect, localize, and quantify the strength of nonlinear sources, including cavitation. Real array element diffraction patterns may differ substantially from those presumed in existing beamforming algorithms. However, diffraction compensation has received limited treatment in passive and active imaging, and measured diffraction data have yet to be used for array response correction. The objectives of this paper were to identify differences between ideal and real element diffraction patterns, and to quantify the impact of diffraction correction on cavitation mapping beamformer performance. These objectives were addressed by performing calibration measurements on a diagnostic linear array, using the results to calculate diffraction correction terms, and applying the corrections to cavitation emission data collected from soft tissue phantom experiments. Measured diffraction patterns were found to differ significantly from those of ideal element forms, particularly at higher frequencies and shorter distances from the array. Diffraction compensation of array data resulted in cavitation energy estimates elevated by as much as a factor of 5, accompanied by the elimination of a substantial bias between two established beamforming algorithms. These results illustrate the importance of using measured array responses to validate analytical field models and to minimize observation biases in imaging applications where quantitative analyses are critical for assessment of therapeutic safety and efficacy.

Highlights

  • A GROWING number of therapeutic ultrasound applications require real-time monitoring for the purposes of cavitation activity optimization, utilization or avoidance [1]–[3]

  • This paper presents array element diffraction pattern examples, quantifies their impact on passively acquired maps of cavitation activity, and illustrates improvements obtained by diffraction pattern correction

  • The corrected map energies are elevated on the order of 3–5 dB, with a relatively modest impact on beamwidth (

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A GROWING number of therapeutic ultrasound applications require real-time monitoring for the purposes of cavitation activity optimization, utilization or avoidance [1]–[3]. Computed responses of finite-size array elements have been incorporated into B-mode ultrasound studies [17]–[19], as well as photoacoustic simulation [20], [21], calibration [22], and reconstruction [23], [24]. Notional far-field directivities have been used to compensate individual element data as a function of angle in the calculation of B-mode images [27], and numerical approximations of finite array element diffraction have been incorporated into a cavitation imaging beamformer [5]. Experimental methods for characterization and compensation of array element diffraction effects have yet to be applied to the development of passive cavitation mapping techniques

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.