Abstract

Differential sensitivity to chemotherapeutics is a limitation in chemotherapy of kidney cancer patients. Role of genetic background in chemotherapy is not fully understood. Therefore, this study evaluated the influence of genetic/epigenetic background of renal cancer cells on the sensitivity to chemotherapeutics. Two renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines, Caki-1 and 786-0, with different genetic makeup of p53 and VHL were treated with doxorubicin either alone or in combination with epigenetic therapeutics 5-aza-2-dc and TSA. Sensitivity of RCC cells to these drugs was evaluated by cell viability and cell cycle analysis and was further confirmed by analysis of selected genes expression. Cell viability data revealed that 786-0 cells were more sensitive than Caki-1 to doxorubicin. Combination of doxorubicin with 5-aza-2-dc or TSA was more effective to inhibit growth of Caki-1 cells but not the 786-0. Data of cell cycle analysis and expression of representative genes for tumor suppressor, cell cycle and survival, drug transporter and DNA repair further provided the molecular basis for differential sensitivity of Caki-1 and 786-0 cell lines to doxorubicin. Important findings of this study suggest that doxorubicin is more cytotoxic to primary renal cancer 786-0 cells with mutant VHL and p53 than the metastatic Caki-1 cells with wild-type VHL and p53, and this differential response was independent of p53 expression level. This study suggests that combination of doxorubicin with epigenetic therapeutics could potentially be beneficial in clinical treatment of renal cancer patients with wild-type VHL and p53 but not in patients with mutant VHL and p53.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.