Abstract
Objective To compare the effects of the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) raloxifene (Evista®) and a continuous combined hormone replacement therapy (ccHRT) formulationcontaining estradiol and norethisterone acetate (Kliogest®) on lipid and fibrinogen levels of postmenopausal women.Methods Euralox 1 was a prospective, randomized, double-blindtrial. After a placebo wash-out, healthy postmenopausal women (n = 1008, average age 56.1 ± 4.9 years) with a health risk profile that suggested a potential benefit from either treatment wererandomly assigned to either 60 mg raloxifene or ccHRT consisting of 2 mg estradiol and 1 mg norethisterone acetate (NETA) per day for 6 months.Measurements Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein(LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol with its fractions HDL2 and HDL3, the LDL/HDL ratio, triglycerides and fibrinogen were asessed at baseline and after 6 months or on early drop-out.Results Baseline values were comparable between the two groups. Blood samples of 841 women (83.4%) were available at baseline and endpoint. Total and LDL cholesterol decreased statistically significantlyfrom baseline to endpoint in both treatment arms (by 7.2% and 3.8% with raloxifene and by 13.0% and 8.9% with ccHRT, respectively). Raloxifene produced a statistically significant increase in HDL cholesterolby 4.2%, while ccHRT induced a decline by 9.5%. Triglycerides were moderately suppressed with raloxifene and ccHRT, by 3.6 and 5.4%, respectively. Fibrinogen fell by 7.0% with raloxifene and rose by 3.6%with ccHRT.Conclusions Continuous combined HRT was associated with decreases in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol about twice as large as with raloxifene, but also with a decrease in HDLcholesterol. The smaller decreases in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol associated with raloxifene were accompanied by an increase in HDL cholesterol and a decrease in fibrinogen. In conclusion, raloxifeneaffects fibrinogen concentrations and the overall cholesterol profile more favorably than ccHRT; these differences may have important implications for the reduction of cardiovascular disease.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.