Differences in the Distribution of IGF-I Concentrations Between European and US Populations.

Abstract

ContextMethod-specific reference intervals (RIs) determine utility of IGF-I as a biomarker in GH-related diseases. Differences between populations might affect applicability of RIs.ObjectiveTo compare population-specific RIs derived from IGF-I routine testing in laboratories in the United States and Europe using the same assay.Design and settingUncensored routine IGF-I testing results generated over 5 years in 4 accredited laboratories (US, n = 778 173 males/710 752 females; Europe, n = 23 220 males/40 183 females).Main outcome measuresConstruction of RIs by indirect statistical methods designed to use routine testing data (modified Hoffmann approach). Comparison to published RIs, between the US and Europe, and between regions in the United States with lower and higher mean body mass indexes (BMIs).ResultsLower limits (LLs) of RIs calculated from all routine data sets do not differ from the published LLs. The same is true for upper limits (ULs) calculated from European routine data. ULs derived from US routine data are significantly higher (children, 10-18 years [mean, %]: boys + 149.3 ng/mL [+34.6%]; girls + 94.9 ng/mL [+19.8%]); adults (19-95 years: males + 45 ng/mL [+20.3%]; and females + 29.7 ng/mL [+13.8%]). Average IGF-I is higher in samples from Colorado (lower mean BMI) compared with Alabama (P < 0.0001), although the difference is smaller than between each of them and Europe.ConclusionsWe provide evidence that in large datasets from the same population, direct sampling and the indirect Hoffmann approach provide comparable RIs. Although LLs are comparable between Europe and the United States, the UL is significantly higher in the United States. We suggest use of adapted RIs for the United States.