Differences in Person-Centred Care Between Public and Private Hospitals in Mongolia

Objectives Few studies have assessed the role of socioeconomic health care disparities in skull base pathologies. We compared the clinical history and outcomes of pituitary tumors at private and public hospitals to delineate whether health care disparities exist in pituitary tumor surgery. Methods We reviewed the records of patients who underwent transsphenoidal pituitary tumor resection at NYU Langone Health and Bellevue Hospital. Seventy-two consecutive patients were identified from each hospital. The primary outcome was time-to-surgery from initial recommendation. Secondary outcomes included postoperative diabetes insipidus, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, and gross total resection. Results Of 144 patients, 23 (32%) public hospital patients and 24 (33%) private hospital patients had functional adenomas ( p = 0.29). Mean ages for public and private hospital patients were 46.5 and 51.1 years, respectively ( p = 0.06). Private hospital patients more often identified as white ( p < 0.001), spoke English ( p < 0.001), and had private insurance ( p < 0.001). The average time-to-surgery for public and private hospital patients were 46.2 and 34.8 days, respectively ( p = 0.39). No statistically significant differences were found in symptom duration, tumor size, reoperation, CSF leak, or postoperative length of stay; however, public hospital patients more frequently required emergency surgery ( p = 0.03), developed transient diabetes insipidus ( p = 0.02), and underwent subtotal resection ( p = 0.04). Conclusion Significant socioeconomic differences exist among patients undergoing pituitary surgery at our institution's hospitals. Public hospital patients more often required emergency surgery, developed diabetes insipidus, and underwent subtotal tumor resection. Identifying these differences is an imperative initial step in improving the care of our patients.

Background: Patient's autonomy is an imperative issue in the health service field.It is a known fact that patient's awareness and understanding of legal and ethical issues related to the consent process is often limited.Adequate information before a surgical procedure is fundamental to give informed consent.Information should include a description of the benefits, risks and complications of the intended procedure as well the alternative treatment options.Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare patients in public and private hospitals of Kuwait as regards their understanding of legal implications, view about the scope, value and function of consent form during the clinical practice.Methods: A comparative descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted in 6 public and 2 private hospitals from January to June 2016 in the state of Kuwait.A total of 910 patients aged 18 years old and above admitted to the surgery departments in the selected hospitals were invited.Structured self-administered questionnaires were distributed to the patients hospitalized in the selected departments of Kuwaiti hospitals.The questionnaire was pilot-tested prior to being finalized.Statistical analysis for the achieved data was done.Results: Of 910 patients, 805 (88.5%) completed the questionnaires.Patients in public hospitals were 584 (72.5%) while those in private hospitals were 221 (27.5%).Significantly higher proportion of patients in private hospitals were in the view that signing the consent form is a legal requirement (88.7%).Significantly more private sector patients agreed that signing the consent form means that all exactly are present in the consent form (91.0%), and the doctor cannot do anything different from what was on the form unless it is lifesaving (82.4%).More patients in private sector hospitals agreed about the statements that the consent form made it clear what was going to happen (79.6%) and the consent form gave the doctors control over what happened (72.9%).There were no statistical significant differences observed between patients in the two disciplines as regards their responses to the statements: the consent form is important (p = 0.167), the consent form made the patient aware of the risks of the operation (p = 0.520), the consent form made the patient wishes known (p = 0.393), the consent form prevents mix ups during the operation (p = 0.470), the consent form was just another piece of paper (p = 0.361), the patient just signed the consent form so he/she could have the operation (p = 0.053) and signing the consent form was mainly to protect the hospital (p = 0.049).Conclusion: Patients in public and private hospitals have limited knowledge of the legal implications of signing or not signing consent forms, indicates that consenting in its current form is not informed and should be reassessed in order to achieve patient autonomy.The policy and decision makers need to develop educational program towards inform consent.

This study aims to assess time trends in case-mix and to evaluate the risk of revision and causes following primary THA, TKA, and UKA in private and public hospitals in the Netherlands. We retrospectively analyzed 476,312 primary arthroplasties (public: n = 413,560 and private n = 62,752) implanted between 2014 and 2023 using Dutch Arthroplasty Register data. We explored patient demographics, procedure details, trends over time, and revisions per hospital type. Adjusted revision risk was calculated for comparable subgroups (ASA I/II, age ≤ 75, BMI ≤ 30, osteoarthritis diagnosis, and moderate-high socioeconomic status (SES). The volume of THAs and TKAs in private hospitals increased from 4% and 9% in 2014, to 18% and 21% in 2022. Patients in private hospitals were younger, had lower ASA classification, lower BMI, and higher SES compared with public hospital patients. In private hospitals, age and ASA II proportion increased over time. Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated a lower revision risk for primary THA (HR 0.7, CI 0.7-0.8), TKA (HR 0.8, CI 0.7-0.9), and UKA (HR 0.8, CI 0.7-0.9) in private hospitals. After initial arthroplasty in private hospitals, 49% of THA and 37% of TKA revisions were performed in public hospitals. Patients in private hospitals were younger, had lower ASA classification, lower BMI, and higher SES com-pared with public hospital patients. The number of arthroplasties increased in private hospitals, with a lower revision risk compared with public hospitals.

During the last decades, there has been an increase in the rate of surgery for degenerative disorders of the cervical spine and in the use of supplementary private health insurance. Still, there is limited knowledge about the differences in characteristics of patients operated in public and private hospitals. Therefore, we aimed at comparing sociodemographic-, clinical- and patient management data on patients operated for degenerative cervical radiculopathy and degenerative cervical myelopathy in public and private hospitals in Norway. This was a cross-sectional study on patients in the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery operated for degenerative cervical radiculopathy and degenerative cervical myelopathy between January 2012 and December 2020. At admission for surgery, we assessed disability by the following patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): neck disability index (NDI), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and numerical rating scales for neck pain (NRS-NP) and arm pain (NRS-AP). Among 9161 patients, 7344 (80.2%) procedures were performed in public hospitals and 1817 (19.8%) in private hospitals. Mean age was 52.1 years in public hospitals and 49.7 years in private hospitals (P < 0.001). More women were operated in public hospitals (47.9%) than in private hospitals (31.6%) (P < 0.001). A larger proportion of patients in private hospitals had high education (≥ 4 years of college or university) (42.9% vs 35.6%, P < 0.001). Patients in public hospitals had worse disease-specific health problems than those in private hospitals: unadjusted NDI mean difference was 5.2 (95% CI 4.4 – 6.0; P < 0.001) and adjusted NDI mean difference was 3.4 (95% CI 2.5 – 4.2; P < 0.001), and they also had longer duration of symptoms (P < 0.001). Duration of surgery (mean difference 29 minutes, 95% CI 27.1 – 30.7; P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (mean difference 2 days, 95% CI 2.3 – 2.4; P < 0.001) were longer in public hospitals. In conclusion, patients operated for degenerative cervical spine in private hospitals were healthier, younger, better educated and more often men. They also had less and shorter duration of symptoms and seemed to be managed more efficiently. Our findings indicate that access to cervical spine surgery in private hospitals could be skewed in favour of patients with higher socioeconomic status.

Background: A key element of the pharmaceutical care plan is the appropriate use of medications. Objectives: Using the WHO/INRUD core drug use indicators, this study sought to evaluate medication usage trends at both public and private healthcare centres in the Lahore district of the Punjab province of Pakistan. Methodology: A cross-sectional and descriptive study design was adopted. For data collection, 399 prescriptions (199 prescriptions from public and 200 prescriptions from private healthcare facilities) were systematically sampled written from February to July 2022. To evaluate the prescription indicator, patient-care and facility-specific indicators, patients randomly selected from both public and private hospitals were examined and interviewed. For each of the WHO/INRUD indicators, we considered ideal criteria that have been published. Results: The average number of medicines prescribed each encounter was reported to be 6.26% in public hospitals and 4.14% in private hospitals among the prescribing indicators, generic medication, antibiotics, and the number of times patients received injections were prescribed, respectively, in 54%, 84%, and 89% of public hospitals and 19%, 61.7%, and 78% of private hospitals. In the public and private sectors, respectively, 71% and 97% of prescription drugs were from the list of essential drugs. The average consultation time was found to be 2.1 minutes in public hospitals and 3.2 minutes in private hospitals, while the average dispensing time was reported to be 37 seconds in public hospitals and 39 seconds in private hospitals. Of the total prescribed medicines, 84% and 97 % were dispensed in public and private hospitals respectively and the percent medicine adequately labelled was 100% in both healthcare facilities. Regarding patient awareness, 69% of patients in private hospitals and 42.5% of patients in public hospitals were aware of the proper dosage, frequency, and duration of the medications that were prescribed. In terms of facility-specific data, both public and private hospitals had 100% availability of the EDL copy and 82% stock of the important medications, respectively. Conclusion: Irrational use of drugs was observed in both public and private healthcare facilities. WHO/INRUD proposed 12 key initiatives to encourage rational use of medications must be put into practice as a result of present study.

The evaluation of the responsiveness of healthcare services, and thus the quality of healthcare services, can be conducted by measuring the satisfaction of patients with the level of quality they receive from the health services. The study aimed at investigating the level of satisfaction, and the determining factors of satisfaction, for hospitalized patients in public and private hospitals in Bulawayo. A cross-sectional comparative study in two large public hospital United Bulawayo Hospitals and Mpilo Central Hospital including three private hospitals Mater Dei Hospital, Galen House and Corporate 24 Hospital was conducted. 200 patients were enrolled through convenience sampling. A brief and validated questionnaire was used and data was entered into STATA15 and further analysed for satisfaction levels and comparison between the five healthcare systems was studied.By using an ordered probit model regression analysis, findings showed patients in private hospitals had higher scores in all evaluated dimensions compared to patients hospitalized in public hospitals. Mean patient satisfaction score in private hospital was 29.04 ± 3.25 which was significantly higher than that of public hospitals was 24.87 ± 3.69 and private hospitals showed an overall better level of satisfaction (p &lt; 0.01) in all aspects. In conclusion, considering the high satisfaction level of the private hospital patients in the study, it is imperative for public hospitals to enact improvement measures concerning organization and management in order to upgrade their quality of health services, in order to earn a competitive place in the country’s health services market.

Hospitals are a major provider of medical care for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons. Although utilization and patterns of care profiles in public and private hospitals have been evaluated for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), one of the most costly and common severe complications of AIDS, information from Veterans Administration (VA) hospitals has not been reported previously. This article reports on inpatient care for PCP patients by obtaining data from VA, private, and public hospitals. Cost and resource utilization data were obtained from reviews of medical records, claims, and provider bills from 26 non-VA hospitals and 18 VA hospitals in 10 cities in the United States. Data on severity of illness, patterns of care, and outcomes for PCP were obtained from medical record reviews from 2,174 PCP cases treated in 82 non-VA and 14 VA hospitals in five U.S. cities. Estimates were made of the average costs and the rates of use of diagnostic tests, anti-PCP medications, and intensive care units for samples of public hospital, private hospital, and VA patients with PCP. With mean charges for a single PCP episode of $14,500 to $16,060, PCP remains one of thea most costly complications of AIDS. Although the severity of PCP illness at admission was greatest at public hospitals, the intensity of care was lowest: for frequency of cytologic diagnosis (48% at public, 62% at VA, and 66% at private hospitals), bronchoscopy (45% at public, 60% at VA, and 66% at private hospitals), and intensive care unit use (11% at public, 22% at VA, and 19% at private hospitals). In-hospital mortality rates for PCP also differed in the three types of hospitals (20% at public, 24% at VA, and 18% at private hospitals). Patterns of PCP care differ among VA, public, and private hospitals. Future studies on the HIV epidemic should include data collected from uniform data sources from VA hospitals, in addition to public and private hospitals, to provide insight on the processes of care and outcomes for HIV-infected persons.

BackgroundA central aim of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) is protection for all against the cost of illness. In a low income country like Bangladesh the cost burden of health care in tertiary facilities is likely to be significant for most citizens. This cost of an episode of illness is a relatively unexplored policy issue in Bangladesh. The objective of this study was to estimate an outpatient’s total cost of illness as result of treatment in private and public hospitals in Sylhet, Bangladesh.MethodsThe study used face to face interviews at three hospitals (one public and two private) to elicit cost data from presenting outpatients. Other socio-economic and demographic data was also collected. A sample of 252 outpatients were randomly selected and interviewed. The total cost of outpatients comprises direct medical costs, non-medical costs and the indirect costs of patients and caregivers. Indirect costs comprise travel and waiting times and income losses associated with treatment.ResultsThe costs of illness are significant for many of Bangladesh citizens. The direct costs are relatively minor compared to the large indirect cost burden that illness places on households. These indirect costs are mainly the result of time off work and foregone wages. Private hospital patients have higher average direct costs than public hospital patients. However, average indirect costs are higher for public hospital patients than private hospital patients by a factor of almost two. Total costs of outpatients are higher in public hospitals compared to private hospitals regardless of patient’s income, gender, age or illness.ConclusionOverall, public hospital patients, who tend to be the poorest, bear a larger economic burden of illness and treatment than relatively wealthier private hospital patients. The large economic impacts of illness need a public policy response which at a minimum should include a national health insurance scheme as a matter of urgency.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12939-016-0458-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

IntroductionHIV and AIDS care requires frequent visits to the hospital. Patient satisfaction with care services during hospital visits is important in considering quality and outcome of care. Increasing number of patients needing treatment led to the decentralization of care to lower level hospitals without documented patient perception on the quality of services. The study determined and compared patient satisfaction with HIV and AIDS care services in public and private hospitals and identified the factors that influence it.MethodThis was a cross-sectional comparative study of patients receiving antiretroviral treatment in public and private hospitals in Anambra State. The sampling frame for the hospitals consisted of all registered public and private hospitals that have rendered antiretroviral services for at least one year. There were three public urban, nine public rural, eleven private urban and ten private rural hospitals that met the criteria. One hospital was selected by simple random sampling (balloting) from each group. Out of a total of 6334 eligible patients (had received ART for at least 12 months), 1270 were recruited by simple random sampling from the hospitals proportionate to size of patient in each hospital. Adapted, validated and pretested Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ18) was interviewer-administered on consenting patients as an exit interview. A Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were conducted at 5% level of significance.ResultThere were 635 participants each in public and private hospitals. Of the 408 patients who had primary education or less, 265(65.0%) accessed care in public hospitals compared to 143(35.0%) who accessed care in private hospital (p<0.001). Similarly, of the 851 patients who were currently married, 371 (43.6%) accessed their care in public compared to 480 (56.4%) who accessed care in private (p<0.001). The proportion of participants who were satisfied were more in public hospitals (71.5%) compared to private hospitals (41.4%). The difference in proportion was statistically significant (χ2 = 116.85, p <0.001). Good retention in care [AOR: 2.3, 95%CI: 1.5–3.5] was the only predictor of satisfaction in public hospitals while primary education [adjusted odds ratio (AOR); 2.3, 95%CI: 1.5–3.4], residing in rural area [AOR: 2.0, 95%CI: 1.4–2.9], and once-daily dosing [AOR: 3.2, 95%CI: 2.1–4.8] were independent predictors of patient' satisfaction among private hospital respondents.ConclusionSatisfaction was higher among patients attending public hospitals. Patient’s satisfaction was strongly associated with retention in care among patients in public hospitals. However, in private hospitals, it was influenced by the patient’s level of education, place of residence, and antiretroviral medication dosing frequency.

To determine the rates of coronary angiography or coronary artery revascularisation procedures in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) managed in private versus public hospitals. Case record linkage analysis of data from the Victorian Inpatient Minimum Dataset for admissions for AMI in the 12 months after the index admission. Victorian acute care hospitals from July 1995 to December 1997. Victorian residents aged 15-85 years admitted to hospital with AMI. Rates of coronary angiography or coronary artery revascularisation procedures after AMI. Compared with public patients in public hospitals, patients with AMI managed in private hospitals were more likely to undergo coronary angiography (rate ratio [RR], 2.17; P< 0.001; 95% CI, 2.06-2.29), coronary angioplasty or stenting (RR, 3.05; P<0.001; 95% CI, 2.82-3.31), and coronary artery bypass grafting (RR, 1.95; P<0.001; 95% CI, 1.79-2.14). Once coronary angiography had been performed, patients in private hospitals were more likely to undergo angioplasty or stenting (RR, 1.94; P<0.001; 95% CI, 1.79-2.11), but were only marginally more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (RR, 1.17; P<0.001; 95% CI, 1.07-1.28). In Victoria, management of patients with acute myocardial infarction is influenced by the public or private status of the patient, and by whether management occurs in private or public hospitals. Patients are more likely to undergo coronary angiography and coronary artery revascularisation procedures in private hospitals.

49 PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE: A COMPARISON OF BLADDER CANCER OUTCOMES IN TWO HEALTH CARE SETTINGS

Comparison of Clinical and Laboratory Features, Drug Availability, and Outcomes of CLL Patients Treated in Public or in Private Hospitals in Brazil: A Retrospective Analysis of the Brazilian Registry of CLL

BackgroundHealthcare-associated illnesses, of which surgical site infection is the most common are significant causes of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and root causes of surgical site infections in public versus private hospitals in Ethiopia.MethodsAn institution based retrospective observational cohort study was conducted among patients who underwent surgical procedures at public and private health facilities from March 15 to April 15, 2018. Samples were selected by the simple random sampling technique, and data extracted from the patient’s medical chart, operation, and anesthesia notes. Data were entered using Epi info version 7 and analyzed using STATA 14. Binary logistic regression was fitted to identify factors associated with surgical site infections in private and public hospitals. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed to assess the strength of associations. Variables with a p-value less than 0.05 in the multivariable logistic regression model considered as significant predictors of surgical site infections.ResultThe overall prevalence of surgical site infections was 9.9% (95%CI: 7.8, 12.5). The prevalence of the infections was higher in procedures performed in public hospitals (13.4%) compared to private hospitals (6.5%). Rural residence (AOR = 0.13, 95%CI: 0.034 0.55), clean-contaminated and dirty wound (AOR = 12.81, 95%CI: 4.42 37.08) were significant predictors of the infections in private hospitals. Similarly, clean-contaminated and dirty wounds (AOR = 4.37, 95%CI: 1.88 10.14), length of hospital stay≥6 days (AOR = 2.86, 95%CI: 1.11 7.33), and surgical operation time of over 1 h (AOR = 15.24, 95%CI: 4.48 51.83) were such factors in public hospitals.ConclusionThe prevalence of surgical site infections was high, and significant differences were also observed between public and private hospitals. Clean-contaminated and dirty wounds, prolonged operation, and length of hospital stay were predictors of surgical site infections among patients in public hospitals, whereas clean-contaminated wound and rural dwellings were predicted the infections among patients operated in the private hospital.

Candida glabrata is an infrequent cause of candidemia in Brazilian public hospitals. We investigated putative differences in the epidemiology of candidemia in institutions with different sources of funding. Prospective laboratory-based surveillance of candidemia was conducted in seven private and two public Brazilian tertiary care hospitals. Among 4,363 episodes of bloodstream infection, 300 were caused by Candida spp. (6.9%). Incidence rates were significantly higher in public hospitals, i.e., 2.42 vs. 0.91 episodes per 1,000 admissions (P< 0.01). Patients in private hospitals were older, more likely to be in an intensive care unit and to have been exposed to fluconazole before candidemia. Candida parapsilosis was more frequently recovered as the etiologic agent in public (33% vs. 16%, P< 0.001) hospitals, whereas C. glabrata was more frequently isolated in private hospitals (13% vs. 3%, P < 0.001). Fluconazole resistance among C. glabrata isolates was more frequent in private hospitals (76.5% vs. 20%, P = 0.02). The 30-day mortality was slightly higher among patients in public hospitals (53% vs. 43%, P = 0.10). Candida glabrata is an emerging pathogen in private institutions and in this setting, fluconazole should not be considered as a safe option for primary therapy of candidemia.

The mass exodus of healthcare workers from the Nigerian healthcare system highlights the urgent need to reevaluate the operational framework. This reevaluation aims to grant healthcare workers greater autonomy to improve their morale and address organizational issues like job dissatisfaction and high turnover. The inability to create new positions or redesign existing roles has contributed to these challenges, necessitating a comprehensive solution. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of job crafting on the moral of healthcare workers in the Nigerian Public Hospitals. It buttressed its argument with Hackman &amp; Oldham’s Job Characteristics Model. All the Doctors and Nurses in the public Secondary Hospitals also known as General Hospitals in Lagos State were used for this study, making a total population of 11,084. The sample size of 725 was determined using Morgan sample size determination table. Quantitative and qualitative methods of analysis were employed. The results of the study show that job crafting has a substantial impact on the morale of healthcare workers in public hospitals. Higher levels of morale and happiness are experienced by healthcare workers who participate in job crafting activities. The crucial elements of job crafting—relational, task, and cognitive—allow healthcare professionals to customise and remodel their work experiences in accordance with their preferences and values. The study recommends that structures be put in place that supports job crafting in the Nigerian healthcare system so as to give a high level of autonomy and flexibility to the healthcare workers thereby boosting their morale for effective and efficient performance.