Differences in opioid use and overdose among younger and older justice-impacted adults

To investigate associations of lifetime history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) with prescription opioid use and misuse among noninstitutionalized adults. Ohio Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) participants in the 2018 cohort who completed the prescription opioid and lifetime history of TBI modules (n = 3448). Secondary analyses of a statewide population-based cross-sectional survey. Self-report of a lifetime history of TBI using an adaptation of the Ohio State University TBI-Identification Method. Self-report of past year: (1) prescription pain medication use (ie, prescription opioid use); and (2) prescription opioid misuse, defined as using opioids more frequently or in higher doses than prescribed and/or using a prescription opioid not prescribed to the respondent. In total, 22.8% of adults in the sample screened positive for a lifetime history of TBI. A quarter (25.5%) reported past year prescription opioid use, and 3.1% met criteria for prescription opioid misuse. A lifetime history of TBI was associated with increased odds of both past year prescription opioid use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.52; 95% CI, 1.27-1.83; P < .01) and prescription opioid misuse (AOR = 1.65; 95% CI, 1.08-2.52; P < .05), controlling for sex, age, race/ethnicity, and marital status. Results from this study support the "perfect storm" hypothesis-that persons with a history of TBI are at an increased risk for exposure to prescription opioids and advancing to prescription opioid misuse compared with those without a history of TBI. Routine screening for a lifetime history of TBI may help target efforts to prevent opioid misuse among adults.

Background: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is increasingly prevalent in North America. Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is an opioid substitution therapy used to relieve symptoms of withdrawal, and to manage OUD symptoms. Despite MMT’s overall effectiveness, individual treatment outcomes vary, and little research explores why these differences exist. Objectives: Considering the association between genetic vulnerability, including family factors, and substance use disorders (SUDs), this study investigated the relationship between family factors and treatment outcomes in individuals with OUD receiving MMT. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study included a sample of 973 adult patients with OUD in MMT. Family factors were defined as number of relatives with an SUD, and their degree of genetic relatedness to the proband. Patient-related outcomes were determined by measuring illicit opioid and non-opioid use during MMT. Results: A significant association was found between number of family members with an SUD and the proband’s illicit opioid use (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.16; P = 0.03). No significant association was found between genetic relatedness and the proband’s illicit opioid and non-opioid use, nor between number of family members with an SUD and the proband’s non-opioid use. Conclusions: These results suggest a role of shared familial environmental factors in OUD treatment outcomes. Specifically, OUD patients with a family history of substance use are at higher risk of relapse during MMT. Based on these findings, healthcare providers should consider stratifying their OUD patients based on family history of SUDs, and providing additional support to those with a positive history to improve their MMT outcomes.

Objectives: Individuals under community supervision (e.g., probation and parole) have high rates of illicit substance use (ISU) and substance use disorders (SUDs), increasing their risk for numerous health issues, including HIV transmission. While SUD treatment can reduce substance use and HIV transmission risk, gaps remain in our understanding of its receipt among community-supervised individuals at risk for HIV. Methods: Using baseline data from the Southern Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Study (SPECS), we examined the prevalence and demographic characteristics associated with SUD treatment receipt among community-supervised individuals at risk for HIV. Two participant subsets from SPECS were analyzed: those with a history of ISU (n = 346) and, among these participants, those specifically reporting a history of illicit opioid use (IOU; n = 211). Results: A high prevalence of SUD treatment receipt was found among participants reporting ISU (58.7%) and IOU (73.9%). Among participants with a history of ISU, Black non-Hispanic individuals had a significantly lower prevalence of treatment receipt than White non-Hispanic individuals (aPR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.90, p = 0.007). Among participants reporting IOU, White non-Hispanic individuals were 2.7 (95% CI: 1.2, 6.3) times more likely to receive medication for an SUD than individuals of any other race or ethnicity. Conclusions: Study findings highlight missed opportunities to engage people on community supervision who are at risk for HIV in evidence-based SUD care. Targeted efforts are needed to promote the adoption of medications for opioid use disorders (MOUDs) among individuals under community supervision, particularly for racially minoritized populations.

The aim of the study was to understand the association of frequent opioid use with disease phenotype and pain pattern and burden in children and adolescents with acute recurrent (ARP) or chronic pancreatitis (CP). Cross-sectional study of children <19 years with ARP or CP, at enrollment into the INSPPIRE cohort. We categorized patients as opioid "frequent use" (daily/weekly) or "nonfrequent use" (monthly or less, or no opioids), based on patient and parent self-report. Of 427 children with ARP or CP, 17% reported frequent opioid use. More children with CP (65%) reported frequent opioid use than with ARP (41%, P = 0.0002). In multivariate analysis, frequent opioid use was associated with older age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 1.67 per 5 years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-2.47, P = 0.01), exocrine insufficiency (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.13-5.24, P = 0.02), constant/severe pain (OR 4.14, 95% CI 2.06-8.34, P < 0.0001), and higher average pain impact score across all 6 functional domains (OR 1.62 per 1-point increase, 95% CI 1.28-2.06, P < 0.0001). Children with frequent opioid use also reported more missed school days, hospitalizations, and emergency room visits in the past year than children with no frequent use (P < 0.0002 for each). Participants in the US West and Midwest accounted for 83% of frequent opioid users but only 56% of the total cohort. In children with CP or ARP, frequent opioid use is associated with constant pain, more healthcare use, and higher levels of pain interference with functioning. Longitudinal and prospective research is needed to identify risk factors for frequent opioid use and to evaluate nonopioid interventions for reducing pain and disability in these children.

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Clinical & ResearchFull AccessDocument Provides Inpatient Guidelines for Medication Treatment of Opioid Use DisorderAbhisek Chandan Khandai, M.D., Josie Francois, M.D.Abhisek Chandan KhandaiSearch for more papers by this author, M.D., Josie FrancoisSearch for more papers by this author, M.D.Published Online:21 Dec 2022https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2023.01.1.39AbstractA new resource document will help strengthen psychiatrists’ capabilities to be team leaders in the treatment of hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder. This article is one of a series coordinated by APA’s Council on Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry.The prevalence, morbidity, mortality, and costs of opioid use disorder have dramatically increased over the past 20 years. While there are several effective and evidence-based medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), less than 20% of Americans with opioid use disorder receive MOUD. The inpatient general hospital setting represents a critical point of access to MOUD, given the significant medical comorbidities of patients with opioid use disorder and the increased time to engage patients in treatment, better monitoring capabilities, and opportunities to reduce the monetary impact of the disorder on the health care system.Psychiatrists are an integral part of the hospital treatment team. However, they are often excluded for many reasons, including stigma toward opioid use disorder, lack of consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry services, and discomfort with managing opioid use disorder.To help address this care gap, APA’s Council on C-L Psychiatry, in collaboration with the Council on Addiction Psychiatry, convened a multispecialty expert workgroup to prepare a resource document related to the medication treatment of patients with opioid use disorder. The workgroup discussed several barriers to medication treatment and factors limiting the involvement of psychiatrists in the treatment of opioid and other substance use disorders in the inpatient hospital setting. Among the barriers they identified were stigma associated with substance use disorders (SUD) and a knowledge gap among psychiatrists regarding SUD treatment. The workgroup then created a resource document that seeks to address these barriers and guide general psychiatrists.The document includes an overview of OUD and its management in adults, explores the pharmacology of MOUD, describes barriers to care and specialty-specific concerns, and provides approaches to reducing stigma. The resource document also compares current medications to treat patients with opioid use disorder (naltrexone, buprenorphine, and methadone), walks psychiatrists through the medications’ initiation and titration in the general hospital setting, and provides recommendations on how to transition patients taking these medications from inpatient to outpatient settings.The resource guide is designed to educate and empower psychiatrists to take a larger role in MOUD in the general hospital setting to save more lives at reduced cost. Psychiatrists are in a strong position to oversee the use of MOUD in hospital settings and are best equipped to lead MOUD treatment and reduce stigma, given our relative expertise in the area of SUDs, comorbid psychiatric illnesses, and harm reduction strategies. As such, it is important that psychiatrists stay up to date on evidence-based MOUD and work with other specialties to promote psychiatric involvement in the care of those with opioid use disorder in the general hospital setting. ■Resource Document on the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder in the General HospitalAbhisek Chandan Khandai, M.D., is a consultation-liaison psychiatry attending at UT Southwestern Medical Center and a member of APA’s Committee on Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry.Josie Francois, M.D., is a first-year psychiatry resident at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. ISSUES NewArchived

BackgroundSyringe services programs (SSPs) provide a spectrum of health services to people who use drugs, with many providing referral and linkage to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, and some offering co-located treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). The objective of this study was to review the evidence for SSPs as an entry point for SUD treatment with particular attention to co-located (onsite) MOUD.MethodsWe performed a scoping review of the literature on SUD treatment for SSP participants. Our initial query in PubMed led to title and abstract screening of 3587 articles, followed by full text review of 173, leading to a final total of 51 relevant articles. Most articles fell into four categories: (1) description of SSP participants’ SUD treatment utilization; (2) interventions to link SSP participants to SUD treatment; (3) post-linkage SUD treatment outcomes; (4) onsite MOUD at SSPs.ResultsSSP participation is associated with entering SUD treatment. Barriers to treatment entry for SSP participants include: use of stimulants, lack of health insurance, residing far from treatment programs, lack of available appointments, and work or childcare responsibilities. A small number of clinical trials demonstrate that two interventions (motivational enhancement therapy with financial incentives and strength-based case management) are effective for linking SSP participants to MOUD or any SUD treatment. SSP participants who initiate MOUD reduce their substance use, risk behaviors, and have moderate retention in treatment. An increasing number of SSPs across the United States offer onsite buprenorphine treatment, and a number of single-site studies demonstrate that patients who initiate buprenorphine treatment at SSPs reduce opioid use, risk behaviors, and have similar retention in treatment to patients in office-based treatment programs.ConclusionsSSPs can successfully refer participants to SUD treatment and deliver onsite buprenorphine treatment. Future studies should explore strategies to optimize the implementation of onsite buprenorphine. Because linkage rates were suboptimal for methadone, offering onsite methadone treatment at SSPs may be an appealing solution, but would require changes in federal regulations. In tandem with continuing to develop onsite treatment capacity, funding should support evidence-based linkage interventions and increasing accessibility, availability, affordability and acceptability of SUD treatment programs.

Motives for opioid use explain the relation between borderline personality disorder pathology and opioid use problems

Post-Discharge Treatment Engagement Among Patients with an Opioid-Use Disorder

Medicolegal Issues with Reference to NDPS and MHCA in Management and Rehabilitation of Persons with Substance Use Disorders.

Disparities in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment use persist across groups, including gender. Using a gender-informed approach to expand treatment capacity and reduce barriers to treatment engagement is vital. We examined SUD treatment need and receipt among people with SUD in the United States, by gender, and assessed gender-specific sociodemographic factors associated with unmet need for SUD treatment and reported treatment barriers. We conducted an analysis of data among adults aged ≥18 with a past-year SUD from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2015-2018). We computed population-adjusted frequencies and proportions for SUD treatment need and receipt and assessed gender differences. Multivariate logistic regression assessed gender-specific sociodemographic variables associated with SUD treatment receipt. Among adults with a past-year SUD, 63.4% were men and 36.6% were women (P < .001), only 10.6% received SUD treatment, and a greater percentage of women than men needed treatment for opioid use disorder (11.9% vs 9.9%; P = .002). Receipt of SUD treatment was lowest among women with alcohol use disorder followed by men with alcohol use disorder (7.5% vs 8.9%; P = .052). Non-Latinx Black men had fewer than half the adjusted odds of receiving SUD treatment than non-Latinx White men (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27-0.71). Latinx women (aOR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.73) and non-Latinx Black women (aOR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.94) had significantly lower odds of receiving SUD treatment than non-Latinx White women. As public health efforts target expanding SUD treatment capacity and addressing disparities in use of SUD treatment, interventions informed by gender and culture should be prioritized.

Impact of prenatal substance use policies on commercially insured pregnant females with opioid use disorder

Reciprocal influences of tobacco use on illicit opioid and alcohol use during the first six-months of specialist addiction treatment

Trends in comorbid opioid and stimulant use disorders among Veterans receiving care from the Veterans Health Administration, 2005–2019

Lifetime use of non-nicotine drugs in electronic cigarette devices among a sample of individuals in substance use disorder treatment

Stigma, Misunderstanding Among the Barriers to MAT Treatment