Abstract
Central motor conduction time (CMCT) is calculated by subtracting latencies from each other measured to a target muscle after transcranial brain stimulation and after stimulation of lumbar spinal nerve roots. Transcranial magnetoelectrical stimulation of the motor cortex has proved to be the most useful method. However this is not true for transcutaneous stimulation of lumbar roots. In healthy subjects electrical root stimuli given at T12/L1 produced compound muscle responses in Tibialis anterior muscles in all 18 trials. However, magnetoelectrical stimulation (100 % stimulus strength) evoked responses in only 8 (Novametrix) and 12 out of 18 trials (Cadwell). Stimulation with the Digi-timer DI90 was less effective. Additionally compound responses after electrical root excitation were more consistent and they had a higher amplitude compared with magnetoelectrical stimulation. Regarding to these results electrical lumbar root stimulation is thought to be the advantageous method despite it is slightly more uncomfortable. Therefore normal results of CMCT to Tibialis anterior (shown in Table 1) are measured after magnetoelectrical transcranial (Digi-timer D190) and transcutaneous electrical stimulation of spinal nerve roots. If the peripheral motor conduction is delayed normal values have to be adapted since CMCT is thought to involve a proximal anterior root segment.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
