Abstract


 
 
 The inflationary use of the term “region”, observable over the last few years in spatial planning circles, has been accompanied by a new sense of confusion in respect of spatial units. In the absence of convincing definitions of the term “region”, at least of relevance to physical planning, the spatial sciences are called upon to develop a new conception of what is meant by “regions”. The author takes the view that the region should not be (mis)understood simply as a physical section of the earth’s surface, but should rather be viewed as an area characterised by socio-economic integration which defines itself as a loosely connected network through the mutual perception of the actors who operate within it.
 
 
 
 
 

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.