Abstract

Abstract : Probabilistic inference word problems require people to integrate three types of information concerning a hypothesized cause of an event--base rate information p(H) concerning the relative frequency of the cause in question, evidence E that the cause was responsible, and the reliability of that evidence p(E/H)--and to evaluate the probability p(H/E) that the cause in question was responsible for the event. Three classes of hypothesis are proposed to explain how people answer these word problems and why the answers often neglect the base rate information--normative probabilistic reasoning, heuristic strategies,and nonnormative information integration. In a questionnaire study, 265 students estimated the probability of the cause before and after each type of information was presented. Information was presented in 6 orders, so some subjects responded to each possible subset of the information. Findings include the following: (1) many subjects respond with numbers that are available in the problem presentation; (2) the more recent information has a greater impact; (3) there is no universally applied weighted averaging scheme that accounts for the average response in all conditions; and (4) the typical subject's responses are well described in terms of the use of strategies contingent on the kind of information that is available. (kr)

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.