Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare 3D volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (VISTA) MRI with and without fat suppression for use in evaluating ligaments, menisci, and cartilage. Two radiologists retrospectively and independently reviewed 71 MRI studies. Each study consisted of 3D intermediate-weighted VISTA images with fat suppression and without fat suppression. The presence of tears of the anterior cruciate and posterior cruciate ligaments, tears of the medial and lateral menisci, and cartilaginous defects was evaluated. Arthroscopic surgical findings were used as the standard of reference. Statistical analysis was performed to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the two methods. Mean specificity and accuracy for medial meniscal tears were significantly higher with VISTA (specificity, 95.0%; accuracy, 94.4%) than with fat-suppressed VISTA (FS-VISTA) (specificity, 81.3%; accuracy, 85.9%), and the difference was statistically significant (specificity, p = 0.003; accuracy, p = 0.004). Mean specificity for cartilaginous defects was also significantly higher with VISTA than with FS-VISTA (99.1% vs 96.8%, p = 0.039). There were no other significant differences between the two methods. Three-dimensional VISTA MRI has higher specificity than FS-VISTA imaging for evaluation of medial meniscal tears and cartilaginous defects.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.