Diagnosis and treatment of magnetic foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract: the experience of four centers

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract is a relatively rare problem in urgent pediatric surgery. Meanwhile, among cases with foreign bodies, they are the most difficult both in terms of timely diagnostics and timely treatment. There are no generally accepted therapeutic and diagnostic standards, and traditional algorithms of patient management are focused on the dynamic observation and are not correct. More so, algorithms described in the foreign literature contradict each other. The rate of surgical interventions and the risk of complications are high. Surgical tactics has many "white spots". All these issues remain open for discussion. AIM: To analyze the experience of four medical centers in the diagnostics and treatment of patients with magnetic foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of diagnostic and treatment techniques applied in patients with magnetic foreign bodies in their gastrointestinal tract from four pediatric surgical hospitals in 2010–2023 was made. In the study there were patients with neodymium magnetic balls from the constructor (38 patients, 50%), neodymium magnets of other shapes and for other purposes (30 patients, 39.5%), ferrite magnets (6 patients, 7.9%), unknown types of magnets (2 patients, 2.6%). RESULTS: Patients’ average age was (4±3.65) years. The fact of foreign body swallowing was revealed in anamnesis of 46 (60.5%) patients. Mental illnesses were diagnosed in 4 children — 5.3%, which is higher than the average incidence in pediatric population. Clinical symptoms were registered in 4 (11.8%) children with a single magnet foreign body and in 33 (78.6%) children with multiple ones. The basic diagnostic technique was an overview radiography of the abdominal cavity (70 cases, 92%), which allowed to identify both a foreign body and complications (signs of intestinal obstruction, free gas in the abdominal cavity). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed in 50 cases (65.8%), out of which one foreign body was detected in 34 (68%) cases, and in 28 patients, foreign bodies were removed. Other diagnostic methods (ultrasound, spiral computed tomography) were used much less frequently. Among curative techniques, open surgeries prevailed — 32 cases (42%). Laparoscopy was used in few cases. CONCLUSION: The timely diagnostics of magnetic foreign bodies in gastrointestinal tract often depends on anamnesis findings, and if there is no such, diagnostics most often is delayed and is made only intraoperatively. Among the diagnostic techniques, it is difficult to identify a universal one that can be recommended as the "gold standard"; however, the most widely used and well-informative is abdominal X-ray and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. As to surgical tactics, the role of laparoscopic interventions is relatively low. Most often, endoscopy or "open" surgery are performed.