Abstract

Devices that utilized three different commercial passivation processes were studied in a nuclear radiation environment to determine if the passivation process influences the radiation tolerance of the device. Comparisons were made between devices obtained from the same manufacturer. The passivation processes studied featured silicon dixoide, silicon nitride and aluminum oxide. Irradiations were performed with the devices in both a biased and unbiased mode. The results show that the device with silicon dioxide passivation degraded the most. The nitride devices having beam leads showed no saturation of the induced degradation while the other processes did for a dose of 1 × 107 (Si). All devices studied showed a small bias dependence. The addition of an aluminum oxide or silicon nitride passivation layer (over the silicon dioxide surface) for an increased reliability definitely induces no increased radiation degradation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.