Abstract

It is known from clinical practice that lymphatic diseases can be associated with reductions of quality of life (QoL). Due to the lack of validated methods, only few studies however have systematically investigated the QoL in lymphedema. The aim of the study was 1) to develop a standardized QoL questionnaire specific for lymphedema and 2) to assess the QoL in these patients. We developed and tested the FLQA-l, a novel QoL questionnaire developed specific for use in lymphedema on the basis of the previously validated FLQA vein questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 92 items that refer to the following scales: Physical status, everyday life, social life, emotional well-being, treatment, satisfaction and profession/household. 392 patients with primary (n = 246) and secondary (n = 146) lymphedema were included in the validation study. The FLQA-l showed good internal consistency; Cronbach's alpha was higher than 0.75 in all scales. There were no floor and ceiling effects and satisfactory item selectivity. The test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change and convergent validity with other psychometric instruments were satisfactory. Clinically, patients with lymphedema showed markedly impaired QoL in all fields, compared to persons with early stage venous insufficiency, and comparable reductions of QoL, compared to patients with venous leg ulcer. These data indicate that the FLQA-l is a reliable and valid questionnaire for the assessment of QoL in lymphedema. Since the QoL is impaired in many patients with lymphedema, QoL evaluation may be helpful for clinical diagnostics as well as for outcome measurement of specific edema therapy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.