Abstract

The purpose of this study was to produce teaching materials using a Think Pair Share type cooperative learning model on valid quadrilateral material. These teaching materials are in the form of Learning Implementation Plans (RPP) and Student Worksheets (LKPD). This study uses the Research and Development (R & D) method with modified steps as follows: (1) Potential and Problems; (2) Data Collection; (3) Product Design; (4) Design Validity; (5) Design Revision and (6) Final Product. The data analysis technique used descriptive statistical analysis techniques. The data collection instrument uses a validation sheet that has been filled out by four validators, namely two Mathematics Education Lecturers, FKIP Islamic University Riau and two Mathematics Teachers at SMP Negeri 21 Pekanbaru. The validation sheet used is the RPP validation sheet and the LKPD validation sheet. Based on the results of the study, it was obtained that the average percentage of the validity of the Learning Implementation Plan (RPP) was 87.3% and the average result of the validity of the Student Worksheet (LKPD) was 83.2%, both of which were categorized as very valid. Then the average percentage of the results of the validation of the Learning Implementation Plan (RPP) and Student Worksheet (LKPD) in each aspect of the assessment obtained a value of 84.69% and 84.66% with very valid criteria. The conclusion is that teaching materials have been produced using the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model on quadrilateral material in class VII SMP which has been tested for validity.

Highlights

  • The purpose of this study was to produce teaching materials using a Think Pair Share type cooperative learning model on valid quadrilateral material

  • These teaching materials are in the form of Learning Implementation Plans

  • it was obtained that the average percentage of the validity

Read more

Summary

Kurang Baik Tidak Baik

Data validasi yang sudah diperoleh selanjutnya dianalisis dengan menggunakan analisis statistik deskriptif. Adapun rumus yang digunakan yaitu (Akbar, 2013): Va =. Penelitian ini divalidasi oleh empat validator ahli, sehingga untuk mengetahui tingkat validitasnya terlebih dahulu dihitung rata-ratanya dengan menggunakan rumus sebagai berikut: Keterangan:. Va1 : Validitas ahli 1 Va2 : Validitas ahli 2 Va3 : Validitas ahli 3 Va4 : Validitas ahli 4 TSe : Total skor empiris TSh : Total skor maksimal yang diharapkan. Selanjutnya dengan menggunakan rumus diatas maka didapatkan hasil validasi ahli dan dapat dilihat interprestasi kriteria kelayakannya sebagai berikut : Tabel 2.

Tingkat Validitas
Sangat Valid Sangat Valid Sangat Valid Sangat Valid Sangat Valid
Sangat Valid Valid Valid
Valid Sangat Valid
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.