Abstract

Background:During the COVID-19 pandemic, it has been necessary to deliver mental health care using technologies (e-mental health). But there have been difficulties in its application. Quantitative systematic reviews such as meta-analysis doesn't allow us to fully identify and properly describe this subject. Thus, our study has two main objectives: a) "to determine what evidence is available for synchronous e-mental health implementation"; and b) "to develop a framework informed by a realist analysis for the implementation of synchronous e-mental health". Methods:We will search MEDLINE, EBM Reviews, PsycINFO, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL Complete, and Web of Science databases from 1st January 2015 to September 2020, with no language restriction. A systematic review with a narrative description and a realist synthesis will be conducted. Primary studies relating to adults with common mental health problems using any type of mobile mental health intervention that includes a synchronic component and communication with a mental health professional will be included. For the analysis, we will make a realist synthesis of the systematic reviews, using a grounded theory approach with an emergent approach to synthesize the information, prioritizing the systematic reviews with a lower risk of bias in the AMSTAR-2 tool. The realist synthesis will be based on the interpretation, integration, and inference of the evaluated elements and the generation of hypotheses to better understand the implementation process of synchronous e-mental health. Finally, we will present the overall assessment in a Summary of Qualitative Findings table. Conclusion: Our results will allow a better understanding of the facilitator and limitations in implementing e-mental health.

Highlights

  • The realist synthesis will be based on the interpretation, integration, and inference of the evaluated elements and the generation of hypotheses to better understand the implementation process of synchronous e-mental health

  • Our study has two main objectives: a) “to determine what evidence is available for synchronous e-mental health implementation”; and b) “to develop a framework informed by a realist analysis for the implementation of synchronous e-mental health”

  • Our study seeks to perform a realist synthesis of the evidence, so we focused on different outcomes to use them as input that allows us to evaluate the implementation of synchronous e-mental health

Read more

Summary

29 Oct 2020

Mental health problems using any type of mobile mental health intervention that includes a synchronic component and communication with a mental health professional will be included. The realist synthesis will be based on the interpretation, integration, and inference of the evaluated elements and the generation of hypotheses to better understand the implementation process of synchronous e-mental health. This new version of the protocol has changed its title, detailing its analysis “a realist synthesis of systematic reviews”. We updated several sections of the protocol to describe better the research question and specifies the realist synthesis using a grounded theory approach with an emergent approach to synthesize the information, prioritizing the systematic reviews with a low risk of bias. Our study has two main objectives: a) “to determine what evidence is available for synchronous e-mental health implementation”; and b) “to develop a framework informed by a realist analysis for the implementation of synchronous e-mental health”

Methods
Huarcaya-Victoria J
Research question
Data synthesis
Confidence in cumulative evidence
Introduction
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.