Development, evaluation, and implementation of an online pain assessment training program for staff in rural long-term care facilities: a case series approach

Most of the rural long-term care (LTC) facilities in China are ill-equipped to manage the physical and psychological needs of older residents with dementia. These facilities mostly consist of older male Tekun (socially and economically vulnerable) adults. Preventing or delaying the onset of dementia is especially crucial for these older Tekun adults. A sample of 711 older male Tekun adults from rural LTC facilities in the Anhui province of China was used to investigate the association between psychological resilience and cognitive functioning, and to examine the moderating effect of activities of daily living (ADLs) on that association. Linear and quantile regression found that resilience was positively associated with cognitive functioning for the total sample, with a greater effect among those with a lower level of cognitive functioning. The benefit of resilience on cognitive functioning was observed only in participants with disability in ADLs. Our findings present evidence in support of interventions to foster psychological resilience and potentially improve cognitive functioning among vulnerable older adults. Resilience-promoting intervention is a strength-based approach that aligns with social work values and can be used in practice. The implications for social work practice were discussed.

BackgroundPain is often underassessed and undertreated among long-term care (LTC) residents living with dementia. When used regularly, the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors With Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC) scales have been shown to have beneficial effects on pain assessment and management practices and stress and burnout levels in frontline staff in LTC facilities. Such scales, however, are not utilized as often as recommended, which is likely to be related to additional record-keeping and tracking over time involved with their paper-and-pencil administration.ObjectiveUsing implementation science principles, we assessed the introduction of the PACSLAC-II scale by comparing two methods of administration—a newly developed tablet app version and the original paper-and-pencil version—with respect to the frequency of pain assessment and facility staff feedback.MethodsUsing a case series approach, we tracked pain-related quality indicators at baseline, implementation, and follow-up periods. A quasi-experimental design was used to evaluate the effect of the method of administration (ie, paper-and-pencil only [n=18], tablet only [n=12], paper-and-pencil followed by tablet app [n=31], and tablet app followed by paper-and-pencil [n=31]) on pain assessment frequency and frontline staff stress and burnout levels. Finally, semistructured interviews were conducted with frontline staff to obtain perspectives on each method of administration.ResultsThe implementation effort resulted in a great increase in pain assessment frequency across 7 independent LTC units, although these increases were not maintained during the follow-up period. Frontline staff reported lower levels of workload in the paper-and-pencil followed by tablet app condition than those in the paper-and-pencil only (P<.001) and tablet app followed by paper-and-pencil (P<.001) conditions. Frontline staff also reported lower levels of workload in the tablet-only condition than those in the paper-and-pencil only condition (P=.05). Similarly, lower levels of emotional exhaustion were reported by frontline staff in the paper-and-pencil followed by tablet app condition than those in the paper-and-pencil only (P=.002) and tablet app followed by paper-and-pencil (P=.002) conditions. Finally, frontline staff reported higher levels of depersonalization in the paper-and-pencil only condition than those in the tablet app only (P=.008), paper-and-pencil followed by tablet app (P<.001), and tablet app followed by paper-and-pencil (P<.001) conditions. Furthermore, narrative data from individual interviews with frontline staff revealed a preference for the tablet app over the paper-and-pencil method of administration.ConclusionsThis study provides support for the use of either the tablet app or the paper-and-pencil version of the PACSLAC-II to improve pain-related quality indicators, but a reported preference for and lower levels of stress and burnout with the use of the tablet app method of administration suggests that the use of the tablet app may have more advantages compared with the paper-and-pencil method of administration.

Background. Although feasible protocols for pain assessment and management in long-term care (LTC) have been developed, these have not been implemented on a large-scale basis. Objective. To implement a program of regular pain assessment in two LTC facilities, using implementation science principles, and to evaluate the process and success of doing so. Methods. The implementation protocol included a pain assessment workshop and the establishment of a nurse Pain Champion. Quality indicators were tracked before and after implementation. Focus groups and interviews with staff were also conducted. Results. The implementation effort was successful in increasing and regularizing pain assessments. This was sustained during the follow-up period. Staff members reported enthusiasm about the protocol at baseline and positive results following its implementation. Despite the success in increasing assessments, we did not identify changes in the percentages of patients reported as having moderate-to-severe pain. Discussion. It is our hope that our feasibility demonstration will encourage more facilities to improve their pain assessment/management practices. Conclusions. It is feasible to implement regular and systematic pain assessment in LTC. Future research should focus on ensuring effective clinical practices in response to assessment results, and determination of longer-term sustainability.

Breast cancer is a leading cause of mortality in women throughout the world. Rural women have a higher risk of dying from breast cancer than do their urban counterparts. Breast cancer incidence rises sharply with age, and research on breast cancer screening for the old-old women in long-term care facilities is scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate the screening services available for breast cancer detection for the elderly women in rural, skilled long-term care facilities in a Midwestern state. Participants in the study were Directors of Nursing for rural long-term care facilities, of which the response rate was 68.4%. Results revealed that elderly women in the rural long-term care facilities do not receive breast cancer screening services within the guidelines of the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute. Also, the self-reports by female Directors of Nursing indicate that even these professionals do not practice or utilize breast cancer screening services within consensus guidelines. Data support the need for a continued focus on breast health programs for rural elderly women in long-term care, and for health-seeking behaviors of nursing professionals.

Rural Long-term Care (LTC) providers face unique challenges when planning, preparing for, and responding to disasters. We sought to better understand challenges and identify best practices for LTC in rural areas. Case studies including key informant interviews and site visits were conducted with LTC staff and emergency planning, preparedness, and response partners in three rural communities. Themes were identified across sites using inductive coding. Communication across disaster phases continues to be a challenge for LTC providers in rural communities for all disaster types. Communication challenges limit LTC providers' ability to address patient needs during emergencies and limit the resilience of providers and patients to future disasters. Limited coordination among local leadership and LTC providers prevents dissemination of information, resources, and services, and slows response and recovery time. Including LTC providers as stakeholders in planning and exercises may improve communication and coordination. More than two decades into efforts to increase preparedness of health care systems to all hazards, rural LTC facilities still face challenges related to communication and coordination. Agencies at the federal, state, and local level should include input from rural LTC stakeholders to address gaps in communication and coordination and increase their disaster resilience.

Can A Complex Online Intervention Improve Cancer Nurses’ Pain Screening and Assessment Practices? Results from a Multicenter, Pre-post Test Pilot Study

Although mental illness among elderly living in nursing homes is a substantial and growing concern, the behavioral problems associated with mental illness or threats to mental health are not well understood, tolerated, or effectively managed by nursing home staff. As a result, resident care and quality of life, and staff morale often suffer. The need for geriatric mental health training in long-term care settings has become increasingly apparent. Psychiatric/mental health nurses are in an advantageous position to address this current need and future challenge through the development, implementation, and evaluation of geriatric mental health education and training programs in long-term care settings. This article describes one such innovative training effort, designed to improve the quality of psychosocial care provided by nursing personnel in rural long-term care settings, and highlights evaluation outcomes related to participant satisfaction, staff knowledge, and attitudes.

Purpose: To compare the score of functional independence measure (FIM) between urban and rural residents living in long-term care facilities (LTCF) in Taiwan.Methods: A total of 437 subjects in 112 licensed LTCF in Taiwan were randomly selected by stratification strategy. Physical therapists interviewed the subjects in nursing homes (NH) and intermediate care facilities (ICF) to obtain the basic data, and the FIM score.Results: (1) There was no significant difference in basic demographic data between urban and rural LTC subjects. (2) Most of the subjects in urban and rural LTCF were males, less than 80 years old, single/widowed, having multiple diseases, using more than one assistive devices, and having social welfare financial support. (3) Motor abilities (eating, grooming, and transfer) and cognition (comprehension, social interaction and problem solving) in rural LTCF subjects were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those in urban areas as revealed by the FIM assessment. (4) The median of FIM total score of rural LTCF subjects was 90.5, which was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that of urban LTCF subjects (median = 76).Conclusions: Some of the functional performance of subjects in rural long-term care institutions is better than those in urban areas. Our results may provide guidelines for the manpower and equipment supply estimation.

Long-term care (LTC) is an important sector of the health care industry. However, the adoption of health information technology (HIT) systems in LTC facilities lags behind that in other sectors of health care. Previous literature has focused on the financial and technical barriers. This study examined the organizational factors associated with HIT adoption in LTC facilities. A survey of 500 LTC facilities in Texas enabled researchers to compile HIT indexes for further statistical analyses. A general linear model was used to study the associations between the clinical/administrative HIT indexes and organizational factors. The empirical outcomes show that the size of an LTC facility has a significant association with HIT adoption. Rural LTC facilities, especially freestanding ones, adopt less HIT than their urban counterparts, whereas freestanding LTC facilities have the lowest HIT adoption overall. There is not enough evidence to support ownership status as a significant factor in HIT adoption. Some implications are proposed, but further research is necessary.

Chronic pain experienced by residents in long-term care is a common complaint that is often underdiagnosed and inadequately treated. This in part may be due to poor nursing practice in pain assessment. To identify factors predicting nurses' performance of pain assessment among older long-term care residents. Furthermore, it will examine the relationship between ageist attitudes and practices and attitudes about pain assessment of older adults. A descriptive correlation survey was carried out among 104 nurses working in a long-term care facility. The survey measured nurses' pain assessment practices and attitude about pain assessment, and attitudes to older people. Linear regression was used to examine associations between the variables. Our results show that nurse assessment is directly and positively correlated with their general knowledge about pain obtained in pre-service nursing studies, but not with knowledge obtained during in-service training. Nurses with a positive, non-ageist attitude towards older adults are more likely to have higher levels of awareness of the need to perform pain assessment. Concerning implementation, we suggest increasing pain assessment training as part of pre-service nursing education. The necessary training should focus on improving attitudes towards older adults, removing negative myths associated with them and increasing appreciation of the importance of pain assessment.

Implementation of Telemedicine Consultation to Assess Unplanned Transfers in Rural Long-Term Care Facilities, 2012–2015: A Pilot Study

Patient preferences for life-sustaining treatment are frequently unknown at critical moments, which often results in clinicians providing treatment that is not medically indicated and/or may not be consistent with patient desires. A consortium of Oregon health care professionals developed the Medical Treatment Coversheet (MTC) to standardize documentation of patient preferences in the out-of-hospital setting by having corresponding physician orders available at the patient's location. We describe a unique process of development, evaluation, and implementation of the MTC. First, we conducted focus groups of providers to help draft the MTC. Second, the accuracy of MTC interpretation was determined by cohorts of acute and long-term care providers by indicating their treatment approach to three hypothetical written scenarios. They responded to the same scenarios twice, with and without the MTC. Responses were compared with each other and with ideal responses (most medically appropriate and in agreement with patient preferences) as defined by an expert panel. Finally, we are instituting pilot projects and developing a plan for statewide voluntary implementation of the MTC. Urban and rural long-term care facilities and emergency medical service systems in Oregon. Focus groups included 28 general internists practicing in urban and rural settings and five nurses working in a long-term care facility. In addition, 87 providers (19 primary care physicians, 20 emergency physicians, 26 paramedics, and 22 long-term care nurses) participated in the evaluation of the form by responding to hypothetical scenarios. Providers in long-term care facilities in both an urban and rural area helped with pilot implementation of the MTC. Use of the MTC in noninstitutional settings was not evaluated. Suggestions from focus groups were incorporated into the form. For the hypothetical scenario responses, ideal appropriateness scores were analyzed, with a total possible score of 30 for each acute care provider and 15 for each long-term care provider. Statistically significant differences were determined using a paired t test. We report the experience of providers who helped with the pilot implementation of the form. Focus groups would use the MTC and believed it would be useful for their patients. Comparing responses to the hypothetical scenarios without the MTC to those with the MTC, 37% of treatment decisions changed for acute care and 29% changed for long-term care providers. Changes were attributable overwhelmingly to withholding treatments consistent with patient preferences. Compared with the ideal, decisions were more appropriate for all specific treatments across all scenarios and clinician groups with the MTC, with one exception: some advanced emergency treatments were withheld inappropriately by 18% of acute care providers with the MTC, (chi-square = 15.94, P < .0001). For all scenarios combined, appropriateness scores increased significantly with the MTC for both acute care (16.4 to 22.3, P < .0001) and long-term care providers (8.8 to 12.2, P < .0001). Overall, providers helping with the pilot implementation were satisfied with the document, organizational endorsements, and available informational resources. We describe our process for development, initial evaluation, and implementation of the MTC. In clinical scenarios overall, the MTC improves the appropriateness of clinicians' decisions about life-sustaining treatments. We are planning statewide implementation of the MTC after appropriate education of clinicians.

Background: Provision of relevant, evidence-based continuing education (CE) is an integral part of maintaining a highly competent rural nursing workforce. Numerous tangible and intangible barriers exist to nurses’ participation in CE in rural settings. Major barriers to accessibility and participation in CE for rural nurses include: 1) Geographic isolation, 2) lack of perceived administrative, financial, and/or technological resources and support, 3) lack of time due to workload, inadequate staffing, and/or travel distance, 4) lack of relevance of continuing education topics, and 5) lack of a dedicated on-site nurse educator. Proactive development of academic-practice partnerships is important to support rural care providers regarding CE delivery. The purpose of this study was to assess perceptions of CE needs of nursing unit staff working in a group of health care facilities in a rural region of midwestern U.S. Methods: A cross-sectional CE needs assessment survey was conducted in winter of 2010 with rural health care providers (N=302/1107; response rate 27%) working in rural healthcare facilities (N=40), including rural hospitals (n=10) and long-term care (LTC) facilities (n=30). A well-validated 72-item Likert-type survey was distributed via a secure online university survey platform, and included assessment of 59 CE need areas. Internal consistency reliability was 0.87. Data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 16.0. Results: Descriptive statistics revealed a greater number of licensed practical nurses and nursing assistants working in rural LTC’s (27.2% and 62.5%, respectively) compared to rural hospital setting (14% and 15%, respectively). There are a large number of associate degree-prepared nurses (63%) working in the participating rural hospitals compared to LTC setting (8.4%). Respondents’ priority learning needs included: 1) Review aspects of medication administration/drug interactions; 2) improve skills in patient assessment (physical/mental); 3) increase knowledge of management of patients with comorbidities; 4) promotion of patient safety; 5) enhance communication skills/teamwork; 6) increase lifelong learning. Student’s t tests revealed LTC nursing unit staff reported significantly higher priority learning needs in “manage aggressive behavior (verbal/physical)” ( t = 2.044, d f = 300, α = .003), “family participation in care” ( t = 2.470, d f = 300, α = .036), and “maintain standards of care” ( t = 2.880, d f = 300, α = .042), whilst acute care nursing staff reported a significantly higher priority learning need in “manage a crisis” ( t = 2.122, d f = 300, α = .050). Conclusions: Study results revealed key learning needs related to several aspects of patient care delivery for rural nursing unit staff who are primarily nursing assistants or nurses meeting minimum state educational requirements. Basic health- care workforce training does not typically emphasize continuous quality improvements, or how to recognize and develop an evidence-based practice at the entry level. The potential for nursing knowledge stagnation among entry level nursing unit staff in rural settings needs to be addressed to help break down isolation barriers impacting knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of health care providers practicing in rural health care facilities.

Acute Pain Assessment and Pharmacological Management Practices for the Older Adult With a Hip Fracture: Review of ED Trends

This article reports on the comparison of the continuing education needs of long-term care nurses employed in rural and urban facilities. A total of 276 licensed nurses responded to a mailed survey requesting information on demographic characteristics and continuing education program preferences. The nurses who worked in rural facilities were older, less likely to have worked in other nursing homes, had less formal training in the care of older persons, and were more likely to be white. Urban and rural long-term care nurses agreed on the importance of some topics and differed on others. Neither rural nor urban nurses received much administrative support for attending continuing education programs. These findings have implications for the continuing education provider and for the nursing home industry as it competes for highly skilled nurses in an increasingly competitive market.