Abstract

This paper proposes a new method to model loss given default (LGD) for IFRS 9 purposes. We develop two models for the purposes of this paper—LGD1 and LGD2. The LGD1 model is applied to the non-default (performing) accounts and its empirical value based on a specified reference period using a lookup table. We also segment this across the most important variables to obtain a more granular estimate. The LGD2 model is applied to defaulted accounts and we estimate the model by means of an exposure weighted logistic regression. This newly developed LGD model is tested on a secured retail portfolio from a bank. We compare this weighted logistic regression (WLR) (under the assumption of independence) with generalised estimating equations (GEEs) to test the effects of disregarding the dependence among the repeated observations per account. When disregarding this dependence in the application of WLR, the standard errors of the parameter estimates are underestimated. However, the practical effect of this implementation in terms of model accuracy is found to be negligible. The main advantage of the newly developed methodology is the simplicity of this well-known approach, namely logistic regression of binned variables, resulting in a scorecard format.

Highlights

  • The International Accounting Standard Board published the IFRS 9 standard in 2014, (IFRS 2014), which replaced most of International Accounting Standard (IAS) 39

  • This paper presented a new methodology to model loss given default (LGD) for IFRS 9 purposes, consisting of two components

  • The LGD1 model was applied to the non-default accounts and is an empirical value obtained through a lookup table, based on a specified reference period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The International Accounting Standard Board published the IFRS 9 standard in 2014, (IFRS 2014), which replaced most of International Accounting Standard (IAS) 39. This paper describes the proposed new methodology to model the LGD for IFRS 9 purposes We estimated both the LGD1 and LGD2 values, where the LGD1 was applied to non-defaulted accounts and the LGD2 to defaulted accounts. The weighted logistic regression was applied on the defaulted accounts (accounts in Stage 3, according to the IFRS 9 definition) to obtain the LGD2. This resulted in two models: one for the LGD1 and one for the LGD2. Logistic regression using the scorecard format provides an even more transparent and user-friendly technique that is easy to understand and communicate to stakeholders For this reason, we propose this new methodology to model the LGD for IFRS 9 purposes.

LGD Methodology
LGD1 Methodology
LGD2 Methodology
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Case Study
LGD1 Results
Additional Investigation
Strengths and Weaknesses of the Methodology
Findings
Conclusions and Recommendation
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.