Abstract

This study explored how private practice occupational therapists determined whether their clients’ need 24-hour supervision, including assessments used, modes of clinical reasoning and therapists’ confidence in their determinations. Survey data from 90 participants were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Participants reported using 166 different assessments to inform decisions about 24-hour supervision and most frequently engaged in pragmatic and conditional reasoning. On average, therapists perceived that they were confident or very confident in their determinations. There is variability in how therapists assess and reason through when 24-hour supervision may be required. Research to develop practice guidelines in this area is needed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.