Abstract

The new regulations on securities misrepresentation in China at the beginning of 2022 have clearly eliminated the need for the antecedent procedure, which has made the issue of the criteria for determining the materiality of securities misrepresentation ambiguous in academic circles, including in judicial practice. In this study, the authors focus on the issue of the criteria for determining the materiality of securities misrepresentation after the elimination of the antecedent procedure. In the course of the study, the authors mainly adopted the thesis analysis method and the case analysis method. Through analyzing the literature, the views of different scholars are combined with actual cases, and finally came to the conclusions. The significance of this study lies in the discussion and clarification of the standard of materiality determination after the elimination of the antecedent procedure, which will provide partial guidance for the academic discussion and judicial practice encountered in this issue.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.