Determinants of survival in sudden cardiac arrest manifesting with pulseless electrical activity

Abstract

ObjectiveThe proportion of sudden cardiac arrests (SCA) manifesting with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) has increased significantly, and the survival rate remains lower than ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, a subgroup of PEA-SCA cases does survive and may yield key predictors of improved outcomes when compared to non-survivors. We aimed to identify key predictors of survival from PEA-SCA. MethodsOur study sample is drawn from two ongoing community-based, prospective studies of out-of-hospital SCA: Oregon SUDS from the Portland, OR metro area (Pop. approx. 1 million; 2002–2017) and Ventura PRESTO from Ventura County, CA (Pop. approx. 850,000, 2015–2021). For the present sub-study, we included SCA cases with PEA as the presenting rhythm where emergency medical services (EMS) personnel attempted resuscitation. ResultsWe identified 1,704 PEA-SCA cases, of which 173 (10.2%) were survivors and 1,531 (89.8%) non-survivors. Patients whose PEA-SCA occurred in a healthcare unit (16.9%) or public location (18.1%) had higher survival than those whose PEA-SCA occurred at home (9.3%) or in a care facility (5.7%). Young age, witness status, PEA-SCA location and pre-existing COPD/asthma were independent predictors of survival. Among witnessed cases the survival rate was 10% even if EMS response time was >10 minutes. ConclusionsKey determinants for survival from PEA-SCA were young age, witnessed status, public location and pre-existing COPD/asthma. Survival outcomes in witnessed PEA cases were better than expected, even with delayed EMS response.