Abstract

The selectivity of α4β2 nAChR agonists over the α3β4 nicotinic receptor subtype, predominant in ganglia, primarily conditions their therapeutic range and it is still a complex and challenging issue for medicinal chemists and pharmacologists. Here, we investigate the determinants for such subtype selectivity in a series of more than forty α4β2 ligands we have previously reported, docking them into the structures of the two human subtypes, recently determined by cryo-electron microscopy. They are all pyrrolidine based analogues of the well-known α4β2 agonist N-methylprolinol pyridyl ether A-84543 and differ in the flexibility and pattern substitution of their aromatic portion. Indeed, the direct or water mediated interaction with hydrophilic residues of the relatively narrower β2 minus side through the elements decorating the aromatic ring and the stabilization of the latter by facing to the not conserved β2-Phe119 result as key distinctive features for the α4β2 affinity. Consistently, these compounds show, despite the structural similarity, very different α4β2 vs. α3β4 selectivities, from modest to very high, which relate to rigidity/extensibility degree of the portion containing the aromatic ring and to substitutions at the latter. Furthermore, the structural rationalization of the rat vs. human differences of α4β2 vs. α3β4 selectivity ratios is here proposed.

Highlights

  • The development of ligands able to enhance the function of brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors has been, and still is, a pursued strategy to approach the treatment of cognitive deficits resulting from neurological and psychiatric disorders and some drug dependences [1]

  • (S)-nicotine is a nanomolar binder at the α4β2 subtype

  • At the beginning of the 1990s, the company Abbot developed and reported many pyrrolidine- and azetidine-based analogs of (S)-nicotine, where the pyridine ring was eitherreplaced by other aromatic rings, such as in ABT-418 [38] or distanced from the alicyclic core by a methylenoxy linker

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Structural features relevant for full or partial agonism and for selectivity over the ganglionic α3β4 nicotinic subtype, which both condition the therapeutic range, remain two topical issues in SAR analysis and design of α4β2 ligands [5,6,7], undoubtedly more challenging than α4β2-α7 selectivity, which is generally more inherent in both highly affinitive α4β2 and α7 ligands [6,8] On this matter, the structures of both human α4β2 and α3β4 receptors, recently determined by cryo-electron microscopy, can be a potent investigation tool suggesting new principles of agonist efficacy and, even more, of subtype selectivity [9,10]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.