Abstract
MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 198:249-260 (2000) - doi:10.3354/meps198249 Detection of spatial variability in relative density of fishes: comparison of visual census, angling, and baited underwater video Trevor J. Willis1,*, Russell B. Millar2, Russell C. Babcock1 1Leigh Marine Laboratory University of Auckland, PO Box 349, Warkworth, New Zealand 2Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand *E-mail: t.willis@auckland.ac.nz ABSTRACT: The ability to make accurate estimates of fish relative abundance is the basis of both ecological and environmental effects studies, and flawed sampling methods may give misleading results even in otherwise well-designed surveys. This paper compares surveys of snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) and blue cod Parapercis colias (Pinguipedidae) conducted using 3 methods (underwater visual census, experimental angling, and baited underwater video) inside and outside the Cape Rodney-Okakari Point marine reserve in northeastern New Zealand. Angling and baited video consistently detected adult P. auratus at protected and fished sites, providing estimates of 36.7 and 39.2 times greater density of fishable P. auratus within the reserve, respectively. Visual surveys provided the least reliable measure of density of P. auratus, with adults only detected at the reserve centre where fish have been habituated to divers by hand-feeding. Measures of the size structure of P. auratus were consistent between angling and video, but mean size was significantly smaller using visual census methods. Relative density of P. colias was similar for all 3 methods, but angling estimated larger mean size, probably due to hook selectivity against smaller fish. The study indicates that methodological standardisation across all species is not always appropriate for environmental effects studies, and that different survey methods should be considered according to the biology and behaviour of the species of interest. KEY WORDS: Angling · Baited underwater video · Exploited fishes · Behaviour · Log-linear model · Marine reserves · Recovery · Survey bias · Visual census Full text in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 198. Publication date: June 05, 2000 Print ISSN:0171-8630; Online ISSN:1616-1599 Copyright © 2000 Inter-Research.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
