Detection of sensitivity and vestigiality of presumptive tests for swabbed blood stains.

Abstract

It is a common practice in forensic casework to use presumptive tests for blood stains before DNA extraction and testing. Stains are usually swabbed and then the swabs are sent for analysis. The Kastle-Meyer (KM) and Leucomalachite green (LMG) presumptive tests for blood are widely used, and their sensitivities have been thoroughly tested in the literature in solution and directly on stains, but not on swabbed stains to mimic casework. In this study, the sensitivity of the KM and LMG tests was tested on eight blood dilutions on cotton fabric and ceramic tile that were stained and subsequently swabbed. Both tests showed sensitivity up to 1:5000, which is slightly lower than reported values in solution or directly on stain but still highly effective in most cases. Stains were also cleaned with common agents, then swabbed and re-tested. Stained ceramic tiles cleaned with soap/water or bleach gave mixed positive and negative results for the 1:10 dilution, presumably due to variance in how thoroughly each investigator cleaned the stain, and other dilutions were undetectable after cleaning. The LMG test gave false positives for bleach cleaned stains, due to reagent reactivity with bleach. Surprisingly, blood was detectible up to the 1:100 dilution with both tests on stained cotton fabric that was cleaned in a washing machine with detergent and dried. Ultimately the KM and LMG presumptive tests remain effective tools for swabbed blood stains, and their practicality for cleaned stains is dependent on material containing the stain, cleaning agent and processing.