Abstract
ABSTRACT Detecting developmental delays is essential for early intervention in low to middle-income countries. A cross-sectional, within-subject, comparative design was employed to determine the performance of the Parents Evaluation of Developmental status (PEDS) tools smartphone application and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III (BSID III) to detect developmental delays in 174 young children aged 3–18 months. Data were collected at a primary healthcare (PHC) clinic in an underserved high-risk community in South Africa. The PEDS tools identified 56% (n = 97), and the BSID-III 35% (n = 61) of the 158 children with possible developmental delays, with an overall agreement of 65% between tests. The PEDS tools referral rate was significantly higher (p = 0.004) than that of the BSID-III. The high-risk nature and age group may have contributed to poor agreement across tools. A combination of tools for screening and assessment in infants in a South African PHC context may be necessary.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
