Abstract

We synthesized a series of novel 3-carboranyl-1,8-naphthalimide derivatives, mitonafide and pinafide analogs, using click chemistry, reductive amination and amidation reactions and investigated their in vitro effects on cytotoxicity, cell death, cell cycle, and the production of reactive oxygen species in a HepG2 cancer cell line. The analyses showed that modified naphthalic anhydrides and naphthalimides bearing ortho- or meta-carboranes exhibited diversified activity. Naphthalimides were more cytotoxic than naphthalic anhydrides, with the highest IC50 value determined for compound 9 (3.10 µM). These compounds were capable of inducing cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 or G2M phase and promoting apoptosis, autophagy or ferroptosis. The most promising conjugate 35 caused strong apoptosis and induced ROS production, which was proven by the increased level of 2′-deoxy-8-oxoguanosine in DNA. The tested conjugates were found to be weak topoisomerase II inhibitors and classical DNA intercalators. Compounds 33, 34, and 36 fluorescently stained lysosomes in HepG2 cells. Additionally, we performed a similarity-based assessment of the property profile of the conjugates using the principal component analysis. The creation of an inhibitory profile and descriptor-based plane allowed forming a structure–activity landscape. Finally, a ligand-based comparative molecular field analysis was carried out to specify the (un)favorable structural modifications (pharmacophoric pattern) that are potentially important for the quantitative structure–activity relationship modeling of the carborane–naphthalimide conjugates.

Highlights

  • Synthesis of Mitonafide and Pinafide Analogs Containing Carborane Clusters cell lines HepG2 and RPMI 2650, and the results showed that the type of boron cluster

  • The novel naphthalimide derivatives containing carborane clusters described in this study were synthesized using the following methods: (1) copper(I)-catalyzed Huisgen–Meldal–Sharpless 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of azides and alkynes (Schemes 1 and 2); (2) reductive amination (Scheme 3); and (3) amidation reactions (Scheme 4)

  • We evaluated the similarity-driven property for the congeneric set of structurally related naphthalimide–carborane conjugates using principal component analysis (PCA) on the pool of 2361 descriptors retrieved from Dragon 6.0 program—constant or nearly constant values with a standard deviation (SD) of

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1,8-Naphthalimides are a class of polycyclic imides consisting of π-deficient flat aromatic or heteroaromatic ring systems. These compounds have been used in biological and nonbiological applications and have mainly been tested as DNA intercalators and anticancer as well as antibacterial, antiviral, and analgesic agents [1]. They exert their antitumor activity through the inhibition of topoisomerase I/II enzymes, photoinduced. Among the most promising and well-described naphthalimides are mitonafide, pinafide, amonafide, and elinafide, which exhibit excellent antitumor activity.

General
Chemistry
Synthesis of Mitonafide and Pinafide Analogs Containing Carborane Clusters
Synthesis
17–20: Reagents
X-ray Structural Analysis
Crystallographic
In Vitro Cytotoxic Activity
Cell bysuch
Oxidative Stress Measurement in HepG2 Cells by Flow Cytometry
Analysis of 8-oxo-dG in HepG2 Cells
Analysis of 8-Oxo-dG in HepG2 Cells
Fluorescence Imaging of Lysosomes
Human Topoisomerase IIα Relaxation Assay
Confocal
Physicochemical Investigation with DNA
Similarity-Based Assessment of Property Profile
50 IC the plane clearly indicated the diagonal separation of the active
12. Distribution
13. Grayscaled compounds ordered by by increasing pICpIC
Materials
Cytotoxicity Assay
Cell Cycle Analysis by Flow Cytometry
Oxidative Stress Measurements in HepG2 Cells by Flow Cytometry
Analysis of 8-Oxo-dG in HepG2 Cells by HPLC-UV-ED
Apoptosis Detection Using Annexin V Conjugate Staining
Autophagy Assay by Flow Cytometry
Lipid Peroxidation Measurements by Flow Cytometry
Fluorescence Imaging Experiment
3.2.10. Human Topoisomerase IIα Relaxation Assay
3.2.11. Statistical Analysis
Preparation of ct-DNA
Circular Dichroism Measurements
Ultraviolet-Visible Spectra Titration
Model Building and CoMFA Modeling
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.