Abstract

The paper discusses the design options for a concentrated solar power plant in Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia. The specific conditions, in terms of weather and sun irradiance, are considered, including sand and dust, humidity, temperature and proximity to the sea. Different real-world experiences are then considered, to understand the best design to adapt to the specific conditions. Concentrated solar power solar tower with thermal energy storage such as Crescent Dunes, or concentrated solar power solar tower without thermal energy storage but boost by natural gas combustion such as Ivanpah are disregarded for the higher costs, the performances well below the design, and the extra difficulties for the specific location such as temperatures, humidity and sand/dust that suggest the use of an enclosed trough. Concentrated solar power parabolic trough without thermal energy storage such as Genesis or Mojave, of drastically reduced cost and much better performances, do not provide however the added value of thermal energy storage and dispatchability that can make interesting Concentrated solar power vs. alternatives such as wind and solar photovoltaic. Thus, the concentrated solar power parabolic trough with thermal energy storage of Solana, of intermediate costs and best performances, albeit slightly lower than the design values, is selected. This design will have to be modified to enclosed trough and adopt a Seawater, Once-trough condenser. Being the development peculiar, a small scale pilot plant is suggested before a full-scale development.

Highlights

  • Concentrated solar power (CSP) parabolic trough (PT) are much simpler and reliable than CSP Solar Tower (ST)

  • While CSP ST coupled to thermal energy storage (TES) has so far performed badly in the real world, CSP PT with TES is already delivering good performances, [1],[2],[3],[4],[5], and hereafter

  • Thermoflow [13] has the models of different CSP PT plants without TES, for example Solar Electric Generating Station (SEGS) VI plant [14]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Concentrated solar power (CSP) parabolic trough (PT) are much simpler and reliable than CSP Solar Tower (ST). They still deliver much better capacity factors (ratio of average generating power to nominal power) in the real world (plants built and operated) despite the theoretically inferior performances in the virtual reality of model computations. With reference to wind and solar (photovoltaic), CSP has, if coupled to thermal energy storage (TES), the advantage of dispatchability vs intermittency and variability [6], [7], [8]. The air may be twelve times dirtier than in the U.S Southwest, or Spain, making operation and maintenance difficult

Weather and solar data
Sample CSP PT models
Latest CSP PT performance data
Findings
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.