Abstract

Improvements in design code provisions for tangential shear in secondary concrete nuclear containment vessels are needed. This paper presents a brief summary of an experimental research program conducted at Cornell University on tangential shear. Six inch thick reinforced concrete panels were subjected to combined in-plane tension and shear as a behavioral model of a section of the wall of the containment under the combined loading of internal pressurization and seismic shear. Approximately 50 panels were tested. Parameters studied included: tension level and direction (biaxial or uniaxial), shear level and type (monotonic, cyclic, or a combined mode), sequence of applied loading, and reinforcing ratio and orientation. The results of the research indicate that current code provisions are overly conservative with regard to the amount of tangential shear to be carried by the orthogonally reinforced concrete. By increasing the allowable stress, the required amount of diagonal reinforcing would be reduced. This would result in savings in fabrication costs and construction time, and improved structural reliability through improved concrete placement. The research also indicates a need for a more exact consideration of containment displacements. Shear stiffnesses for the panels were extremely low, indicating that containment displacements may be larger than anticipated. The code provisions in this area are limited and unsubstantiated.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.