Abstract

In vision science, cascades of Linear+Nonlinear transforms are very successful in modeling a number of perceptual experiences. However, the conventional literature is usually too focused on only describing the forward input-output transform. Instead, in this work we present the mathematics of such cascades beyond the forward transform, namely the Jacobian matrices and the inverse. The fundamental reason for this analytical treatment is that it offers useful analytical insight into the psychophysics, the physiology, and the function of the visual system. For instance, we show how the trends of the sensitivity (volume of the discrimination regions) and the adaptation of the receptive fields can be identified in the expression of the Jacobian w.r.t. the stimulus. This matrix also tells us which regions of the stimulus space are encoded more efficiently in multi-information terms. The Jacobian w.r.t. the parameters shows which aspects of the model have bigger impact in the response, and hence their relative relevance. The analytic inverse implies conditions for the response and model parameters to ensure appropriate decoding. From the experimental and applied perspective, (a) the Jacobian w.r.t. the stimulus is necessary in new experimental methods based on the synthesis of visual stimuli with interesting geometrical properties, (b) the Jacobian matrices w.r.t. the parameters are convenient to learn the model from classical experiments or alternative goal optimization, and (c) the inverse is a promising model-based alternative to blind machine-learning methods for neural decoding that do not include meaningful biological information. The theory is checked by building and testing a vision model that actually follows a modular Linear+Nonlinear program. Our illustrative derivable and invertible model consists of a cascade of modules that account for brightness, contrast, energy masking, and wavelet masking. To stress the generality of this modular setting we show examples where some of the canonical Divisive Normalization modules are substituted by equivalent modules such as the Wilson-Cowan interaction model (at the V1 cortex) or a tone-mapping model (at the retina).

Highlights

  • The mathematics of Linear+Nonlinear (L+NL) transforms is interesting in neuroscience because cascades of such modules are key in explaining a number of perceptual experiences [1]

  • Regarding the insight obtained from analytical expressions, in physiology, (a.1) we show how the context-dependence of the receptive fields of the sensors can be explicitly seen in the expression of the Jacobian w.r.t the stimulus

  • (a.1) we show how the context-dependence of the receptive fields of the sensors can be explicitly seen in the expression of the Jacobian w.r.t. the stimulus. (a.2) We show that the expression of the Jacobian w.r.t. the parameters reveals that the impact in the response of uncertainty at the filters, or synaptic weights, varies over the stimulus space, and this trend is different for different sensors. (a.3) We show how the general trends of the sensitivity over the stimulus space can be seen from the determinant of the metric based on the Jacobian w.r.t. the stimulus. (a.4) We show that this Jacobian implies different efficiency in different regions of the stimulus space

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The mathematics of Linear+Nonlinear (L+NL) transforms is interesting in neuroscience because cascades of such modules are key in explaining a number of perceptual experiences [1]. In visual neuroscience, perceptions of color, motion and spatial texture are tightly related to L+NL models of similar functional form [2,3,4]. Understanding the transform computed by the sensory system, S, goes beyond predicting the output from the input. The mathematical properties of the model (namely the derivatives, rS, and the inverse, S−1), are relevant. We show that the Jacobian matrices and the inverse provide analytical insight into fundamental aspects of the psychophysics of the visual system, its physiology, and its function. The Jacobian matrices and the inverse enable new experimental designs, data analysis and applications in visual neuroscience. Related applied disciplines like image processing that require computable and interpretable models of visual perception may benefit from this formulation

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.