Depth-related patterns of meiofauna on the Indian continental shelf are conserved at reduced taxonomic resolution

Abstract

Taxonomic sufficiency (TS) has been used in impact assessment studies of various pollution effects on marine benthic communities and found appropriate to identify the effects of pollution on marine communities. Cost, in terms of the expertise and time needed to identify organisms, increases with the level of taxonomic accuracy. Recently, TS has been adopted to study spatial patterns of macrobenthic community structure. In order to accept TS as a routine approach in wider benthic studies, it needs to be proved valid for various taxa and in geographically different areas. The present study investigates the value of TS in meiofaunal nematodes by analyzing an extensive data set based on samples collected from a wide geographical area covering a large depth gradient. For this study, samples were collected from every degree square of the western Indian continental shelf (7°–22°N latitudes). Our high resolution data showed that with increase in depth, nematode species richness and diversity decreased and communities showed significant variation between shallow and deeper waters. The present study tests whether lower taxonomic resolution nematode data can explain community shifts along a depth gradient in a similar way to species level data from the same data set. Meiofauna have often been neglected from benthic studies, and most attention has been given to macrofauna. This is mainly due to the difficulty in the taxonomic identification of meiofauna. The results of this study based on univariate and multivariate analyses support the use of family level data of nematodes to explain some aspects of depth variation in a similar way to species level data.