Abstract

ABSTRACTDepressing dependence? Transfers and economic growth in the German states, 1975–2005. Regional Studies. Most countries pay substantial intergovernmental transfers to poor regions with the aim of achieving regional convergence. Consequently, transfers should have a positive effect on economic growth. However, it is equally possible that transfers perpetuate underdevelopment. This paper studies empirically the effect of intergovernmental transfers on economic growth with a panel of West German states over the period 1975–2005. The findings suggest that transfers do not foster economic growth, presumably because the recipients use them to subsidize declining industries.

Highlights

  • Most countries redistribute public resources between regions through intergovernmental transfers

  • We study econometrically how transfer dependence affects economic development with a dataset covering the 10 West German states over the period 1975-2005.2 we explore the effect of transfers on economic growth and potential transmission channels such as retarded structural change and distortions in state fiscal policies

  • We study the effect of intergovernmental transfers on economic development based on the West German States

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most countries redistribute public resources between regions through intergovernmental transfers. It is difficult to link transfers causally to low levels of growth based on anecdotal evidence because it is unclear whether economic development in transfer-dependent regions would have been even worse without the transfers. We construct an instrument based on an arguably exogenous reform of the intergovernmental transfer scheme in 1995 that increased the intensity of equalization and led to higher transfer dependence in the net-recipient states. This reform was necessitated by the need to integrate the East German States into the transfer system, but the changes in the equalization law affected all states. This paper contributes to the research on the link between fiscal decentralization and economic growth (Xie et al, 1999; Stansel, 2005; Thornton, 2007; Baskaran and Feld, 2013; Asatryan and Feld, 2015; Baskaran et al, 2016)

Institutional details
Construction of the panel
Empirical approach
Baseline results
Robustness
Transmission channels
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.